User talk:CRamel16/Personal sandbox

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Wikipedia User: Cgchapman

Date of review: 05/04/2013 Name of editor: Wikipedia User: CRamel16
 * Replace with username for version on talk page**

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CRamel16/Personal_sandbox Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/04/2013 Date review submitted to instructor: Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed
 * Replace with username for version on talk page**

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Edit is accurate to the information in the textbook. Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Information accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology Wikiformatting: Good wikiformatting

Grammar & composition: Good grammer and composition

Other comments: None

Cgchapman (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Ramnel Cortorreal-Rosario CRamel16

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CRamel16/Personal_sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): 3 sentences

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: bullets and numerical, list form

Grammar & composition: Perfect grammar and composition

Other comments: PERFECT!!

--Christina geo (talk) 20:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight

Date of review: 05/06/13

Name of editor: Ramnel Cortorreal-Rosario

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CRamel16/Personal_sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): The edit was 3 sentences

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: bullets and numerical, list form

Grammar & composition: Good grammar and composition

Other comments: None — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsPsychology (talk • contribs) 02:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)