User talk:CSCarlosXXVIII

Your contributed article, The Clockwork Angel


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Clockwork Angel. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - City of Fallen Angels. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at City of Fallen Angels - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Favonian (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Prince/ss X of Wales
Hullo and welcome to Wikipedia. I notice you've moved the articles of the children of Frederick, Prince of Wales under the belief that they all bore the "Prince/ss X of Wales" title. We've had this discussion before (see here for example), and have established that the tradition of calling a child of the Prince of Wales "Prince/ss X of Wales" began with Princess Charlotte, daughter of George IV. Before then, they were simply "HRH Prince/ss X". I'm going to go through reverting your moves — I hope you won't object. Yours DBD 16:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)