User talk:CSMention269/Archive 6

Speedy deletion nomination of Damayanti Sen


A tag has been placed on Damayanti Sen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)


 * As expected, I know this will happen. @Liz, can we change it to draft version back? CSMention269 (talk) 06:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Or we can go for AFD? CSMention269 (talk) 06:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

mitragyna speciosa change
i removed the mention of psychosis because the cited article didnt say anythign about it and there is no evidence that it causes psychosis. it is likely something that pharmaceutical companies want people to believe but either way, there is no evidence for it and if its going to be on the page it shouldnt be one of the first things people see. 154.5.201.230 (talk) 06:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * ever going to respond? this is inaccurate information and there have been many times i have had to remove things from pages i frequent as they were edited inaccurately and not reverted. why does this keep gettign reverted? it is misinformation and all i am doing is removing what isnt supported by real evidence. 154.5.201.230 (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * See, I'm kind of busy right now so I can't give you a detail explanation. I think you read the reverting edit summary (mostly not citing evidence with WP:RS to verify the explanation you made. ☮️CSM269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 11:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:CS Lebowski Rejection
Hi! I'm new to writing Wikipedia articles. Can you help me understand why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:CS_Lebowski keeps getting declined for it's references? The reference I've included is in-depth, secondary, reliable, and independent so I'm not sure why that's being used as the reason. Thanks for your help! Gkrhines (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Gkrhines, thank you for asking. It's clear that you didn't add any references except one, which won't work. For articles to comply Wikipedia rules, it is necessary to add reliable, secondary and independent citations. In case it is one. I suggest to read the guidelines and accondingly find the citations and add it. ☮️CSM269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 15:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've seen that I need to add multiple solid references. I've just added them to the draft and resubmitted it, so hopefully it passes next time! Gkrhines (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Good for you. But I recuse from re-reviewing your draft. Try researching the subject and maybe you may the sources which generally have WP:SIRS and in-depth coverage. ☮️CSM269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 16:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi CSMention269. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 00:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
 * Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

Kamran Aliyev (Jurist)
I added secondary references as you mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redivy (talk • contribs) 20:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Good to hear this. A new reviewer will look into this draft. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 03:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @CSMention269 I wish you success in your work, thank you.￼￼ Redivy (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Revoke rights request
After this incident I want an admin to remove my AFCR,PCR and rollback rights for now. I am been ashamed of myself I just reported a backlog about an RFP page, and not Hat collection business. I will stay with my NPOL articles creating job. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 15:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I removed your PCR and rollback privileges, but I don't know what "AFCR" is, and regardless, you have no other privileges except the automatic ECB. Ping me if there's something I'm missing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Article for Creation reviewer, @Bbb23 sir. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 16:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no such privilege. AFAIK, technically anyone can review new pages, even though they are supposed to meet the qualifications of the AFC project.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok sir, then thank you for the needful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 16:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Protect the page
Ever do any hunting? It's a duck blind. I'm watching that draft. (in my Elmer Fudd voice) I'm huntin duck. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * 😁 ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 05:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Govind Dholakia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Govind Dholakia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Govind Dholakia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Charlie (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)