User talk:CTcitizen

AfD nomination of New Yorseycut
I have nominated New Yorseycut, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/New Yorseycut. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Newsaholic (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Newsaholic (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I want to respond to the | points you raised in the discussion about deleting New Yorseycut. Two of the key tenets of Wikipedia are notability and verifiability. Wikipedia is not intended to be a place to make something notable that isn't already through original scholarship. If this new phrase really interests you, perhaps you could write about it somewhere else. Newsaholic (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: New Yorseycut
Hi there. Thanks so much for taking the time to right this article. I'm sorry that your first experience with Wikipedia was at the Articles for Deletion process. Wikipedia has a number of content policies that can make it a little tricky for a new editor (that's you!) to write an article that will not be challenged. I'm closing this discussion as a delete, which means that your article will be removed from the main part of the encyclopedia. However, I have moved it to a section within your user space, User:CTcitizen/sandbox/New Yorseycut. You are free to continue to work on the article at this location, and if you get to the point where you feel that it may be appropriate for the main encyclopedia, just let me know and I'll be happy to look at with you. The thing that will help the most is if the term is noted by other sources. Please keep writing articles, and don't hesitate to ask if you have questions. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)