User talk:CV1983CV

December 2016
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "I've been assigned the duty of updating the terminology..." - This suggests you have been paid to make edits to this site, and have done so without properly disclosing such motivations. As such, and as your username is a violation in its own right, you have been blocked. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Article Exchange here (Cole Varner) okay, yes I can actually see the reason I was blocked. I have added the unblock request, here are the reasons. Article Exchange (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Kuru, the proposed username is below; ColeWiki. How would you suggest I distinguish the difference in two separate and unique databases? I would prefer not to have any endorsement from the ILL page. Would it be better to add a citation that links to Article.Exchange explaining the difference between them? I thought that was what Wikipedia was for ( a sincere apology if it's not.) In any case, please look at the username and let me know if that is Okay to use. I will delete the citation from the site page, but would you please provide an answer in regard to how you'd distinguish two separate databases and how you would do it? Also, the Wikipedia back link from our site to the disambiguation page will be removed if that helps. Thank you!

(Article Exchange (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC))

Yamla, Yes, I have no intention of promoting anything about Article.Exchange, I understand there are proper avenues, I wouldn't have made such an idiotic blatant mistake if I hadn't been sincerely trying to clear up the difference on Wikipedia. But now I know and understand the rules.

I'd like to use my account to start working on some Wikipedia articles and news though, if I am allowed to, as well as meeting others here.

Thank you for taking the time and consideration to review everything

Cole

(Article Exchange (talk) 15:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC))