User talk:CWCvilleresident1982

Welcome!
Hi CWCvilleresident1982! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Rumors
Wikipedia is not a rumor mill. Spreading unsubstantiated claims that a marginally notable person was spotted somewhere is not the stuff encyclopedias are made of. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I added Insider as a citation. It is reliable. CWCvilleresident1982 (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * How is it poorly soured? Insider is a reliable source and it is not defamatory. Am I insulting her? CWCvilleresident1982 (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * We are referring to different passages in the article. The first addition is unsourced. Regarding Insider, see WP:RSP. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd  (talk)  17:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm not trying to edit war, just add updates to breaking news. CWCvilleresident1982 (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Midlothian, Virginia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GabberFlasted (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Schazjmd  (talk)  17:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)