User talk:CWD

Hi Cwd, are you going to abandon your Roger the Negotiator mediation case since you 'gave up' like you claimed on the Roger the Negotiator discussion page? Please let the Cabal know so that we can close the case if it is no longer necessary. Thanks. Jsw663 12:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of ND-001 Nadesico
An editor has nominated ND-001 Nadesico, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Triana Orpheus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Triana Orpheus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Triana Orpheus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk)  10:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)