User talk:C S Dept. JO

Please
Please do not delete well-sourced info as you have recently did in Nasser Judeh's page.Egeymi (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Why?
Why are you continuing to delete sourced info? If you have any concern, then please discuss it in the talk page of the article.Egeymi (talk) 12:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nasser Judeh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Egeymi (talk) 12:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I have blocked you further for disruptive editing. The block appeal rules as laid out above still apply. Lectonar (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)