User talk:C filev

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A le_Jrb talk 09:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Stop changing sourced population figures. Admins checking this editor, see Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive563. --Enric Naval (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Since, despite the above warnings, you have continued to make the same unconstructive edits without any explanation, you have been blocked for 31 hours. When you return, please start discussing what you are trying to do here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, Bosniaks, Czechs, Croats, etc., you will be blocked from editing. — Emil J. 14:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Stop adding unsourced population figures to the articles of Croats, Bulgarians, etc. You have to provide sources for your changes. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan  &#124;   39  15:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

........ C filev 20:56, 23 September 2010(UTC)

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)}}|

........ C filev 20:56, 23 September 2010(UTC)

Beeblebrox (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC) Original research is not allowed here. You have to cite reliable sources.--> Gggh  talk/contribs 18:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

October and November 2010
User:C filev 22:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Blocked again
For continued disruption while editing log out as 78.83.249.8, I have reblocked your account indefinitely. You may appeal this block by adding template. Elockid  ( Talk ) 19:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, could you unblock my other account User:C philev, that was blocked as a sockpupet of this exblocked account C filev 22:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The reason being? Elockid  ( Talk ) 20:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

You first have to warn me, you didn't warn me at least once, that's not honestly. And I don't understand for what I am blocked, for editing unlogged? C filev 12:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * You've already been blocked and warned for your disruptive edits which you have been doing while log out as 78.83.249.8. Given the warnings on your IP sock's page and your account's page, the block and on your account is totally justified. Also, you've already been sufficiently warned in the past. There is absolutely no need to warn you again. You were given a second chance, but the behaviour after the block is still disruptive. This is evidently you with the same exact reason in addition to the contributions. Poor man's checkuser also indicated that my block did not give you an autoblock. That could only mean that you were editing from a blocked IP address. Note, I blocked that IP address before you were blocked. A word of advice, lying will not help you to gain the community's trust. A statement on your other account stating that the account is not you. But you have admitted to me that that account is yours and the last request even had the same unblock reason. Elockid  ( Talk ) 14:18, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/78.83.249.8. Look that and see that I haven't been warned, you've blocked me without warn. And I haven't did vandalism, I don;t want to show you all my edits and evidence, if I was doing vandalism you shall to show me as you block me, *I only did vandalism two or three times in Albania's page, but I haven't seen that I was removing sources(just a mistake) and you can't block me for this without warn. Give reason why you blocked me without warn, that's unhumaned you had to warn me????? And when you accuse me for vandalism again and blocked me twice for it, what reason I have to give for unblocking, but that's not true I haven't been doing vandalism i just mistaked in Albania's page that's not reason to block me. And also when you don't warn me you have to block me for hours or week, not indefinetely!!C filev 19:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Like I said previously, you were given a second chance and the second chance wasn't use very constructively. Quote:I only did vandalism two or three times in Albania's page. "And I haven't did vandalism". Isn't this contradicting? Is there a particular reason while you were edit warring while being logged out? Secondly, what reason(s) can you give why the block should be removed other than the ones you've been stating? Tnxman already decline your unblock request which basically uses the same reason you are stating. Given that you have lied about your previous account, is there a reason why the community should trust you? Please respond. Elockid   ( Talk ) 18:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

If I contune to vandalize (as you pervert)-no, but the truth is that I didn't vandalize- I only mistaked some 2 or 3 times in one page(Albania). After that you didn't warn me at laest once and block me not for hours, not for week, but indefinetely-honestly I've been supruised. You delete the list of my contribbutions and now you say that I've been vandalizing. Stop this guff and unblock me there were no reason and any vandalism to block me.

I remembered the vandalism(that's human mistake not vandalism) for you blocked me, I 've removed 2 refered statistics without knowing(CIA's religion distribution of Albania and US.gov. religion distr. of Albania) that are all things that I have removed as a mistake, when i was editing. That's two removings by mistake, is that vandalism and have you done mistakes like that? C filev 21:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * You are not blocked for vandalism. Your are blocked for repeated disruptive editing. Secondly, I never blocked you or the IP for a week. Thirdly, several editors on the IP page have complained about your editing. The conditional reason to your unblock was "any more problems will almost certainly result in another indefinite block". I believe that you have not fulfilled the conditional reason from what I have stated and seen. You still have not answered the other questions I have asked nor given any advancing arguments. Please do so. Fourthly, your explanations are not consistent. You know, you can also still try to appeal your block by adding the unblock template. Elockid  ( Talk ) 19:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)