User talk:C masul

Problems with upload of File:Baligod aldwin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Baligod aldwin.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Pacis arnulfo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pacis arnulfo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Baligod aldwin.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:USLT Libraries: Multimedia Section


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:USLT Libraries: Multimedia Section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mean as custard (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of USLT Libraries: Electronic Resource Center (ERC)


A tag has been placed on USLT Libraries: Electronic Resource Center (ERC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mean as custard (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi. I'm sorry that your articles have been deleted. This is partly because they weren't the sort of thing that goes in an encyclopaedia, as they didn't fit our policy WP:GNG about notability. Other reasons why the didn't fit are that they had a lot of 'how to' material. Please see WP:NOTHOWTO. We don't host instructions on how to do things. I am also concerned that they seemed to have been copied from a guide produced by the university. Any material that is published (that is, made available for people to read) is copyright unless it is so old now that it has passed into the public domain, or is declared to be public domain (as with certain governmental publications. Wikipedia can only use outside material if it is public domain or licensed for free use under CC-BY-SA 3.0. This is because Wikipedia is licensed under that for free reuse by anyone anywhere, and non-licensed material isn't licensed - that sounds obvious when it's pointed out, but it isn't if it hasn't been brought to one's attention. Peridon (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)