User talk:C raj32

Copyright problems with Pu La Deshpande Garden
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Pu La Deshpande Garden, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.punesite.com/pu-la-deshpande-park-in-pune.html. As a copyright violation, Pu La Deshpande Garden appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Pu La Deshpande Garden has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pu La Deshpande Garden and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Pu La Deshpande Garden with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pu La Deshpande Garden.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 13:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * In addition to the copyright issue, the article was unambiguously promotional. Either of these would have been sufficient reason for the article to be speedily deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)