User talk:Cacklebanny

A tag has been placed on Pussycam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CascadiaTALK | HISTORY 02:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place  on the page (Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. CascadiaTALK | HISTORY 02:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Please explain why this site is noteworthy enough to have an enyclopedic entry on Talk:Pussycam. CascadiaTALK | HISTORY 02:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Catcam
Articles must satisfy the notability guidelines here, and provide multiple independent verifiable sources for the notability (ie not the parent website, myspace, youtube or similar).

Although I personally have some reservations about Jennicam, there is no doubt that it is fully referenced in line with the above. There is nothing to stop you recreating Catcam, since I haven't protected it, but it is bound to be speedied again unless you can address the notability issue. jimfbleak 06:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)