User talk:Cadbury Wispa

Ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /

List of supermarket chains in Ireland
Hi, I see you moved the page List of supermarket chains in Ireland to Supermarkets of the Republic of Ireland. Page moves relating to the name of the Irish state are subject to an ArbCom ruling until WP:IECOLL returns. You action cannot be undone without admin inventions. I assume you were unaware of the current situation. Please do not move any more articles relating to the name of the Irish state until WP:IECOLL return. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 21:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Primark
It is OK to move an article when it is likely to be uncontroversial. But once you move an article and it is moved back, it is not OK to edit war over moving the article. Discuss the proposed move on the article Talk page instead. --HighKing (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Moves in general
Hello Wispa; thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I've just reverted your move of High-speed Sea Service to an operator-specific name. Afterwards taken the liberty of reviewed previous moves and—it appears that virtually all have those moves have later had to be similarly reverted. It might be worth holding off doing a move and checking on the Talk: page for other editors' feeling. Once again, many appreciations for getting involved. —Sladen (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terry's All Gold


The article Terry's All Gold has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No demonstration of notability outside the parent firm. Not every product deserves its own article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova 357 00:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. Jus da  fax  18:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/86.45.71.28 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. McGeddon (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been. (blocked by MuZemike 20:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AfD nomination of St Michael Food hall
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is St Michael Food hall. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/St Michael Food hall. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Cadbury Wispa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. McGeddon (talk) 21:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of ABC Bournemouth
I have nominated ABC Bournemouth, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/ABC Bournemouth. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AerDart


A tag has been placed on AerDart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Toymaster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toymaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Toymaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. S Æ don talk 00:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Marty Whelan
Template:Marty Whelan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UCI Cinemas
Template:UCI Cinemas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)