User talk:Cadetrain

Welcome...

Hello, Cadetrain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome! Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 02:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

DNA Results
The DNA results are not due back in February 2019. They have been back for months. Stop saying that. Stop trying to claim otherwise, especially with links that do not claim it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellmark (talk • contribs) 02:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Turpin case
Hi Cadetrain, thanks for your additions, but please see WP:BLPNAME for why the children's names shouldn't be in the article, and WP:IRS for why we can't use ordinary self-published blogs as sources. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 02:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your AfC Submission has been moved
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that one of your submissions to the Articles for Creation (AfC) project has been moved and is now located at Draft:List of arrests made with GEDmatch, which is the preferred namespace for AfC submissions. It has not yet been accepted for publication and you may continue to work on it in its new location. If you have already submitted the draft for review, then nothing has changed and it will be reviewed by a volunteer who will offer feedback for improvement, or accept and publish it as an article. If you have not already submitted it for review, you may do so when you are ready. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of arrests made with GEDmatch (January 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of arrests made with GEDmatch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of arrests made with GEDmatch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_arrests_made_with_GEDmatch Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_arrests_made_with_GEDmatch reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cooper Barnes d


A tag has been placed on Cooper Barnes d requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Externalfile-drive-9c1cf14106bc6fe2251c955808376213d37d03d0-root-sj river january 2019 08.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Externalfile-drive-9c1cf14106bc6fe2251c955808376213d37d03d0-root-sj river january 2019 08.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Srich32977. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 23andMe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The article in Fortune only mentions 23&me, it doesn't tell us their policy. WP requires verification. Thanks.''  – S. Rich (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Kim Richards Screenshot 2019-02-09 at 5.49.03 PM.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kim Richards Screenshot 2019-02-09 at 5.49.03 PM.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

List of perpetrators of crimes arrested or identified with GEDmatch.com moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of perpetrators of crimes arrested or identified with GEDmatch.com, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kb03 (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Gucci Flip Flops for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gucci Flip Flops is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gucci Flip Flops until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leviv&thinsp;ich 04:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from DNA Doe Project. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --  Gourami Watcher Talk 21:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Natalie Shaw
What "unfixable issues" does Natalie Shaw have that con be fixed by adding an unsourced middle initial? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The issues were not fixed and the tags should not be removed until they are. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Proposed deletion of Cooper Barnes (actor)


The article Cooper Barnes (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. –eggofreason(talk &middot; contribs) 17:12, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

reply it has no references because i have not yet put them on.

Cooper Barnes (actor) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cooper Barnes (actor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cooper Barnes (actor) (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAPTAIN_MEDUSA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   17:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Your Image at Virgin MiamiCentral
Do you perhaps have a higher-resolution version of the image you added to the Virgin MiamiCentral page? The has a very low resolution which doesn't look too great in the infobox. Jadebenn (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

No i do not.

Alright. Well, it's fine until a higher-resolution image becomes available. Also, you should sign your posts by typing  at the end of them. It produces this: Jadebenn (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cooper Barnes (actor) (April 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Cadetrain, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Robert Eugene Brashers have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

TheFamousPeople.com as a source
Hi Cadetrain. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in Lina Medina. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cooper Barnes (actor) (May 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cooper_Barnes_(actor) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cooper Barnes (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)