User talk:Caducastro

Proposed deletion of My Last Mistake (Eduardo Leveck's song)


The article My Last Mistake (Eduardo Leveck's song) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eduardo Leveck


A tag has been placed on Eduardo Leveck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GSS (talk |c|em ) 07:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Eduardo Leveck for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduardo Leveck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eduardo Leveck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 16:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Eduardo Leveck. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 23:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Eduardo Leveck, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All Monsters


The article All Monsters has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica ✿ / talk 00:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates
Please do not remove maintenance templates (notices at the top of pages that indicate it needs improving in some way) until the issues have been properly addressed. I'm sure Eduardo Leveck's articles will be deleted very soon anyway, so your attempts to make him appear notable (a claim that he charted on the Brasil Hot 100 Airplay when he didn't, referencing Facebook for a book he has apparently published) will really have been for nothing anyway. I also would not be surprised if you were him or somebody working for him, in which case this would be a conflict of interest and promotion.  Ss 112  14:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Eduardo Leveck, you may be blocked from editing. Removing the AfD template will not stop the deletion process. —C.Fred (talk) 03:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eduardo Leveck


A tag has been placed on Eduardo Leveck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  13:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)