User talk:Caedmon scop

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * If you didn't want to evade scrutiny, you should have provided your user name from the get-go, not just brought up mid-argument that you'd log in. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * For the benefit of any reviewing admins: 's IP address (but not account) was blocked after threatening to log in to "escalate" an edit war. Ya know, instead of editing while logged in or giving their user name from the get-go.  I didn't carry out that block, just declined the unblock request on grounds of WP:NOTTHEM and WP:NOTVAND.  They then came to my talk page and asked (both metaphorically and literally) to be blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

You should withdraw your request for arbitration
BMK was editing the Enoch Powell article long before you even registered -- which makes your accusation of stalking ridiculous and a possible sign that you're incapable of assuming good faith (a requirement to edit here).

As I explained on my talk page, you're this close to a WP:NOTHERE block. If you want to avoid it, you need to find a topic where you can at least pretend to assume good faith and don't view everything in a "you vs the world" mentality. Basically get a fresh start under this account. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Should I? Or would that simply allow you two to continue to abuse people and dominate them? Caedmon scop (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You could have chosen to not respond, and watched as ArbCom rejected your report and topic banned you from articles relating to American politics. Instead, you decided to continue being confrontational, only proving my point.  If you continue to refuse to get that that's not how things work here, that's not going to work for you.  Also:

Ian.thomson (talk) 01:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Bill Ayers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''There is a fine distinction between a group being described as a terror group, and a person being described as founder of a terrorist organization. It's a WP:BLP issue.'' Tarl N. ( discuss ) 02:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to build an encyclopedia by this community's standards (in particular, viewing everything in a "you vs the world" mindset instead of assuming good faith). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration Case Request - Prematurely Filed
In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

For grievances about the conduct of a Wikipedia editor, you should approach the user (in a civil, professional way) on their user talk page. However, other mechanisms for resolving a dispute also exist, such as raising the issue at the administrators' noticeboard for incidents.

In all cases, you should review Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact a member of the community if you have more questions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

(edit: adding signature).

NOTE: I should like to thank the person who reviewed my request for arbitration for their good and useful direction. I appreciate the professional and clear explanation of the procedure. I will read this closely. I look forward to being more active and according to the procedures; they are scattered and quite hard to grasp for a reasonably new user who has never had any issues in 10+ years of contributing as a guest only before deciding to make an account this year... thank you very much!

Caedmon scop (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user has engaged in block evasion as in March, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And May, 2019 as . --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 12 May 2019 (UTC)