User talk:Caeraustralis

Thanks for your contributions to the Samhain article. While I appreciate what you're trying to say there, I do think it's covered sufficiently in the "questioning" section, and doesn't need to be expounded upon in the brief intro. I would also recommend you look over the WP:NPOV section, and remember that content needs to be added in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, and we must avoid placing undue weight on particular theories. I see you've been adding links to a website with the same name as your username. If you are connected with this website, you need to be aware of WP:COI - Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. If you wish to add a link to your site, you need to discuss it on the talk page first, so other editors can have a chance to evaluate the material. Thanks for checking out the guidelines and policies, and welcome to Wikipedia. Slàinte Mhath, -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 19:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Your contribs to the Samhain article
I don't want to belabour the point but I agree with what Kathryn NicDhàna said above. The fact that your user name is the same as the website you are determined to insert into the article indicates that you have an agenda and a POV to push. While all contributions are welcome, they should adhere to a neutral point of view, a central content policy of Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, giving undue weight to some theories at the expense of a balanced presentation of the information is generally considered unencyclopedic and frowned on. Please look at the wikilinks in Kathryn and my comments here; they are intended to help you understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I gently and respectfully suggest that you might want to engage in discussion on the talk page of the Samhain article about what you'd like to see changed in the article. If you have any questions about Wikipedia or this issue, I'd be more than happy to answer them on my talk page. Cheers, Pigman 00:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I decided to revert the changes you introduced to the Samhain article. As I said, if you'd like to discuss this, I urge you to take it up on the talk page of the Samhain article. Fairly well-developed and sourced articles like this one generally need such discussion before significant changes are introduced. Not always but in this case I recommend it. Thanks! Pigman 01:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)