User talk:Caerwine

On what will probably be a permanent WikiBreak. Don't bother leaving any messages unless you want them ignored. Caerwine Caer’s whines 05:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Say it ain't so!
I miss you already. Please come back. Someday. :{ Her Pegship  (tis herself) 15:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Same here. A good wikifriend and colleague. Hope this is only temporary. Grutness...wha?  23:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Julia Duffy (Axis of Time)
I have nominated Julia Duffy (Axis of Time), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Julia Duffy (Axis of Time). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of United States political families (X)
A tag has been placed on List of United States political families (X) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. JulesH (talk) 08:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of James Fairchild (transport)
I have nominated James Fairchild (transport), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/James Fairchild (transport). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TexasAndroid (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. لenna vecia  18:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Ice hockey personnel by nationality
Category:Ice hockey personnel by nationality and others which you created have been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dick Crest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dick Crest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dick Crest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Thisbites (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Image discussion at article 17 Mile Drive
A discussion is underway about images on an article you have contributed to. Please help find a consensus for the article stub at: Talk:17-Mile Drive.--Amadscientist (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foreign establishment


The article Foreign establishment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced article under a neologism as title with no known solid official evidence exists definitively confirming in the English language of such usage, and originally started off by an IP-number address registered to an University in Singapore; the article read a bit like an incoherent but incomplete anti-British and anti-American anti-Colonial rant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 212.50.182.151 (talk) 12:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Caerwine/Finding Omi (Xiaolin Showdown)
User:Caerwine/Finding Omi (Xiaolin Showdown), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Caerwine/Finding Omi (Xiaolin Showdown) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Caerwine/Finding Omi (Xiaolin Showdown) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 14:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Someone else nominated this, but didn't alert you.
. 41.132.48.255 (talk) 05:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:IR-4.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IR-4.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of United States v. DuBay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States v. DuBay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United States v. DuBay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  22:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:American film actors
Category:American film actors has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpacklambert (talk • contribs) 17:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TOC-Xiaolin Showdown
Template:TOC-Xiaolin Showdown has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sfr-r
Template:Sfr-r has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi Caerwine! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stevie Benton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stevie Benton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stevie Benton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jax 0677 (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Joe McDoakes title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joe McDoakes title card.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:European nobility has been nominated for renaming
Category:European nobility has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)