User talk:Caffeinebot

Username
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

 Soxred  93  00:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

-

Hi, no offense taken- I understand your sensitivity on the issue. So to relieve your concerns, here is an explanation: I use caffeinebot to express my complete and utter reliance on the chemical compound to provide me the inspiration I need to go about my daily business.

An alternative alias I use is caffein that pays homage to the alternative spelling of the compound. This however isn't exactly unique- a google search for caffein yeilds a large number of hits. Caffeinebot, however, yields four pages (currently) of results all but a few of which are results of my interactions on the web. If you were to investigate the results you will notice the freshmeat account thats associated to me- and an OSS project as well.

Reading the wikipedia username policy- I suspect that I am in violation of a "confusing" or "misleading" username. However, given my earlier explanation and the policy's own claim that the purpose of a username is to identify contributors, I would suspect that it would be far more advantageous for the community to accept caffeinebot over caffein. I hope that you will agree :).

Thanks, Caffeinebot

Proposed deletion of Qlix
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Qlix, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this is notable. Lacks references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)