User talk:Cafzal

Abit late, but still:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ian ¹³ /t  09:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * Thanks for welcoming me, Ian! I have been here a while but it is only now that I have picked up my activity here. --clearthought 13:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
Thanks for the welcome! Pressure Thirteen 01:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I hope you enjoy your time editing here on Wikipedia! ~ clearthought 04:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Figo page
Hi there, not sure why you put back the duplicated information on the Figo page. A lot of the article is repeated and this was my first bash at removing one of the most obvious duplications. It is generally in a bit of a mess. --Bcnviajero 19:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * When I put some of the information back, I could not find where it was duplicated. Yes, that article needs cleanup, but I could not find the duplicated information that warranted the taking out of that large of a chunk of that article. ~ clearthought 22:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

MediaCircus.TV
Hey -- I'm sure just a misunderstanding, but please realize that db-bio doesn't apply to companies. It's meant for individual people or small groups of them (like musical groups), not corporations. Also, even if db-bio did apply to this type of article, it wouldn't apply in this case, because the article explains the subject's importance. Things that are non-notable can be deleted, but not through speedy deletion. May I suggest you use WP:PROD? It'll probably go through with no problems. Mango juice talk 18:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for letting me know that. I am new to these deletion protocols. ~ clearthought 18:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

List of places beyond Bikini Bottom
I just wanted to tell that saying something like this article is not importance is not a reason for it to be speedied deleted. As such, I've listed it for deletion at Articles for deletion/List of places beyond Bikini Bottom if you'd like to add your opinion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks for letting me know. ~ clearthought 20:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. Any other questions, just ask. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Irish American
can you please stop adding in POV rhetoric...the irish page was fine until you changed it to have a pure ulster scots feel...this is an irish american page...it is talking about those who are irish american and those who chose irish american...as per the last census 34million chose IRISH and only 4.9 million chose SCOTCH-IRISH....irish catholic immigration has been far larger in numbers than scotch-irish...most of the millions of irish who came into americn during the mid 19th century to the 20th century were overwhelmingly irish catholic...the census asks people to choose their ethnicity and they did...thus there is no need for u to makeup numbers and choose it for them...i love how who just came up with a figure of 23-30 million are of scotch irish descent...if u truly believe that then right it up on the scotch irish page and leave the irish american page alone..i am just getting tired of changing it after putting in so much hard work into it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.142.34 (talk • contribs)


 * You stop adding your rhetoric to the mix. That information has every right to be in that article. Please also sign your comments. ~ clearthought 20:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You say: if u truly believe that then right it up on the scotch irish page and leave the irish american page alone. If you believe that to be the case, then why are you removing the same information from the Scotch-Irish page as well ? IrishGuy talk 20:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

My rhetoric...
ha...with all due respect...that information has no sources...it is pure made up garbage...there are not 23-30 million scotch irish...yes they were fundamentally important to colonial america but in all actuality they were small as far an immigrant groups..roughly 250, 000 came over before massive Irish Catholic immigration...most Irish immigrants to America came after 1840 and most were Catholic...so based on that it only makes sense for their to be more Americans to choose Irish as compared to Scotch-Irish....also where do you get off saying that all Irish Americans want a united Ireland..that is such a bold statement...did u ask each and every irish american...i think not....the reason u have the scotch irish term is because the protestant irish did not want to be compared to the poor gaelic speaking catholic irish who were immigrating into american by the millions from the 1840s to well into the 1900s...so your reasoning behind the origin of the term is pure rubbish...start reading some wider sources of information and enter scholarly facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.142.34 (talk • contribs)


 * First you say that the content belongs with Ulster-Scots, and then when it is shown that you removed it from even there you change gears. As I told you every other time you have shown up ranting, the content you dispute was added by 85.1.55.41. Not by me. Not by Cafzal. Read WP:CIV and WP:ATTACK before you continue with your hostile behavior. If you want to have a dialogue, we will do that. If you want to keep leaving unsigned rants all over Wikipedia, that isn't going to work. IrishGuy talk 22:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * What you are saying is rubbish, pal. In addition please sign your comments: ~ . There is census and other data on the topic of which you speak. In addition why did you remove it, as IrishGuy said, from the Ulster-Scots article too? ~ clearthought 23:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to User talk:Willywonka3505
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. - CobaltBlueTony 15:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for letting me know. ~ clearthought 15:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The UN Page
Thank you, im kinda new so its nice to feel appreciate. The article is just so messy...~ Jcdams 15:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Date links
Please don't make edits like this. Per our guidelines, full dates which include a month and a day should be Wikilinked (including the year), while standalone years should not be Wikilinked. You unlinked a valid full date and then linked a standalone year, which is the opposite of what should be done. -- Cyde Weys 14:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I did not know that. Thanks for passing on the info! ~ clearthought 15:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Re:Piping
Hi Cafzal/Clearthought - Piping is adding a vertical bar and some indexing information within a template or category. Only a very small number of templates allow this - and none of the stub ones do - it's mainly used for categories. Your previous edit was to add Witton Lakes, which wouldn't have done anything that england-geo-stub wouldn't have done. In any case, Witton Lakes is automatically be indexed under Witton, since it's at the beginning of the article title, so piping was doubly unnecessary in this case. Grutness...wha?  23:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright. Thanks for explaining that to me. ~ clearthought 23:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Enlighter1 socks
Thanks for helping fight the vandalism of this really annoying user and his sockpuppets. Much appreciated. Thisthema n  02:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I only fight serious vandals, and work mostly on editing and contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks also to people like you for your hard work! ~ clearthought 02:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Reply about 2006 ILC
Just in case, I've replied on my talk page. CP/Mcomm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Lead
I replaced the heavy lead with the previous consensus version because those sources are for the most part repeated elsewhere, and don't to help the WP:Lead, which is supposed to be an extremely concise summary of the article. Additionally, consensus has also held that they be removed in the interests of size. And of course, the current structuring contains disputed assertions. Let me know if you have any qyestions. Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 20:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not against a concise lead, but I don't like it when good references and good summary information is removed. In addition, some of your edits changed some of the wording even though it needed no changing (in my opinion). There are some people -- and I don't mean you -- who feel the need to push their agenda, and the ILC page is falling pray to some of those people. I just want an informative, objective article that follows both proper writing and Wikipedia styles. ~ clearthought 20:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Edits
The 8 to eight isn't the issue. The problem was that each tag is its own unit, so the "publisher" or any entry must be wikified each and every separate time so that the

Gregbard 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality Project
Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Thanks, Jame§ugrono 07:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Idontknow 610 TM 19:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

-- S M S  Talk 20:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio
 Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot  ( Disable )  03:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)



AfD: Manichaean paranoia
Hi! I've nominated the article Manichaean paranoia for deletion because I deem that it is not notable and cannot become notable, because of the inherent contradiction in this political phrase. I'm giving you a notice on this because you have contributed to the article and I deem you have rights to have a say in the matter. My elaborate analysis of the failures of the article can be read in Talk:Manichaean paranoia. The discussion for (and against) deletion is kept in this page (WP:AfD/Manichaean paranoia (2nd nomination). Be welcome to partake! ... said: Rursus (bork²) 13:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Ohio meetup
Brainstorming is taking place! Feel free to check it out, and make sure to add your name to the possible attendees if you'd like more information, as this page is mostly gauging interest at the moment.  hmwith τ   02:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio
Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

List of Massachusetts State Parks
Better late than never no? I am trying to model the revamp of the Mass State Parks on the Pennsylvania State Parks featured list. any advice or assistance would be helpful - even if you are just commenting on my work, that would be enough to keep me going. EraserGirl (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chinola
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chinola. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Chinola. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 12:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Oxfordcompaniontophilosophycover.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Oxfordcompaniontophilosophycover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  04:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016


Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elsa Jane Forest Guerin
Hello, Cafzal. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elsa Jane Forest Guerin, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

My new account
From now on, I will be editing Wikipedia under the name "TitanSymphony", so that I can make a fresh start here. TitanSymphony (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)