User talk:Cagwinn

Archive
/Archive 1

December 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Vanamonde (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Less than two months after a block for edit-warring, you've made four reverts, against two different users, in the space of 5 hours. I have therefore blocked you for two weeks (and some might consider that lenient). If you do not work on being less trigger-happy, you are likely to end up indeffed sooner rather than later. Vanamonde (talk) 03:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I am not the one edit warring and my reverts were entirely justified. Cagwinn (talk) 04:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * User talk:331dot - did you even bother looking at the talk page of one of the articles on which I am accused of "edit warring", where other editors agree that is the other party who is in fact engaging in an edit war?? That other party even reverted my edit YET AGAIN!! Where is his/her ban?? Cagwinn (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * This is the fifth block for edit warring. You really need to read up on the subject and what to do instead. You're saying the same things you said when I declined your appeal a short time ago. Please.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * It's almost as if you people purposely want Wikipedia to suck! I restrict my editing here to subjects on which I have very specialized knowledge - frankly, Wikipedia is lucky to have someone like me, as few others who specialize in Celtic historical linguistics and Arthurian studies are interested in doing so, precisely because of petty little bureaucrats such as you. Why should I even bother? Let Wikipedia rot. Cagwinn (talk) 18:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please come back. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 19:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

The above comment combined with your poor attitude and lack of acceptance of the fact you were edit warring has now earned you an indef block with talk page access removed. You will need to use UTRS to request unblock, if you wish. 331dot (talk) 19:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

What if he's right? SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks are never acceptable. This user had a clear pathway to being unblocked, but they chose to not take it. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)