User talk:Cahk/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:
 * Learn about what we are trying to do by reading the five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style. See if you can write a great article!
 * Create a User page.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).
 * Read the Policies and guidelines.
 * Add yourself to the New user log.
 * If you don't know what to do or how to do something, there are lots of guides at the Help portal.
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Be bold!
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance. If you ever get bored, or don't know how to help, visit the ToDo List at Community Portal. There are millions of jobs to be done, article to be improved, written, deleted, images added or edited, and groups/clubs to join!

If you have any questions, or just want a chat, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing. —Vanderdecken&there4; ∫ξφ 19:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image of Canadian PR Card
Hi. You uploaded the image of a Canada Permanent Resident Card to WP. I suspect this must be your PR card or you would have had to seek permission from the person who's card it is to uploaded it. Anyway, are you sure you want to display the card image with the full name, date of birth and signature clearly visible? May I recommend uploading a new image with personal details blanked out, as is common for such documents uploaded to WP.

re U-Pass etc
Hi Cahk. U-Pass and Universal Transit Pass seem to be separate articles. Could you explain the problem to me a little bit more? Herostratus 07:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. How about we rename U-Pass to Vancouver U-Pass and then make U-Pass a redirect to Universal Transit Pass. Herostratus 08:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and did this. Herostratus 08:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, I made the disambiguation page. Don't be shy to do this yourself if the need arises! Cheers, Herostratus 05:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Honorific prefixes
Hi, I noticed that you've been adding prefixes to some biographic articles (i.e. Michaelle Jean, Iona Campagnolo. The Manual of Style states that such titles should not be mentioned in the text inline, but can be discussed elsewhere. I don't particularly agree, but I don't think it's going to change anytime. I just thought I might let you know.

-- Ibagli ( Talk ) 22:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BbsHK.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BbsHK.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kavadi carrier 14:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Gordon Campbell
Hello. I removed that by accident. Sorry about that. -- No Guru 23:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BbsHK.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BbsHK.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 07:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Nevermind... Seems I was wrong :) Happy editing! -- lucasbfr talk 07:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

BC Government House
Very Sorry. I wasn't familiar with the styles of a Canadian lieutenant-governor, and I thought that "Her Honour The Honourable" came from a copy-and-paste mistake or a needless duplicity for a member of the Canadian Privy Council. Thanks for catching the mistake. -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 00:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Biometric HKSAR passport
please upload new image of biometric HKSAR passport. The older image of Hong Kong SAR passport is no longer up-to-date. Thanks for your attention. 72.138.191.63 15:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Passport
Hey,

Yeah, I do realize that passports are always the property of Her Majesty, but by that same token the photo should be able to be posted under Crown Copyright, as it is held in Right of Her Majesty. This differs from many of the other federal content/photographs, which are held by the Government of Canada and therefore have different reproduction rights.

Anyway, not that it matters. I just felt an example should be posted. Snickerdo 05:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Sam Sullivan
Sorry about that then. I had no idea. And I don't think I am able to press any "religious beliefs" onto my edits, since I don't even have a religion to start with. -→ Buchanan-Hermit™ / ?! 19:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Monarchy in Canada
It seems to me that instead of saying "the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors", it's more succinct to say "the Governors General and Lieutenant." Why repeat the word Governor twice? --G2bambino 19:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand that the official title is "Lieutenant Governor of ...." However, all eleven vice-regals are governors (ie. they govern), of which there are two types: general and lieutenant (one that governs generally and ten lieutenants to govern below him/her). Hence: the Governors General and Lieutenant.  In fact, now that I think about it, the words should probably not be capitalized, and the instead should read "the governors general and lieutenant." --G2bambino 19:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize, but, while saying "Most of the Queen's domestic duties are performed by the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors" is accurate, I fail to see how the sentence "Most of the Queen's domestic duties are performed by the governors, both general and lieutenant" is either incorrect, or even confusing. It is aready explained in length that the Monarch is represented by a Governor General at the federal level and Lieutenant Govenrors at the provincial level. As well, the article is already long enough. But, if you feel so stongly that it needs to be repeated yet another time, and it seems you do as you've already changed it, then so be it. However, there really is no need to explain again that the Commissioners are not vice-regals. --G2bambino 19:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't want to nit-pick on this too much, but I think you're a little confused about the role of the Canadian governors and their titles. The governors in Canada are called governors because, well, they govern.  One is a governor general because he/she governs the country over all, ie. generally. As the Constitution Act states, the Governor General is the "Chief Executive Officer... carrying on the Government of Canada on behalf and in the Name of the Queen."  The provincial governors are subordinate to the federal governor, and thus are called his/her lieutenants.  Neither has anything to do with military ranks.  The nature of the offices inspires their titles, not the other way around.
 * The Canadian governor general did indeed exercise executive power after 1867, as did the lieutenant governors. That usage of the reserve and constitutional powers has diminished, but the powers remain, meaning the governors continue to govern, making them not simply ceremonial bodies.
 * As per the GG being Commander-in-Chief: the Constitution also states that it is the Queen who has command in chief over the Canadian Armed Forces. The Governor General, through the 1901 Militia Act, performs the functions of this position as the Sovereign's representative.  Thus, the office of Commander-in-Chief is shared between the Queen and her vice-regal, and is accorded to them through law, not merely as a ceremonial function.  Of course, due to the principals of constitutional monarchy, neither person will exercise their powers as C-in-C without the advice of their ministers, but the principal remains the same.
 * I apologize if this is long-winded, but Canada's constitution is a rather convoluted thing. --G2bambino 20:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

The Lieutenant Governors are appointed by the Governor General, not the Sovereign (as Australian state Governors are). They cannot defer any reserved provincial bills to the Monarch, but only to the GG, who may then defer them to the Queen. Ergo, though they are the representatives of the Queen in Right of their respective province, they remain subordinate to the Governor General. Granted, this relationship between the vice-regals is ever-evolving. Further, the 1947 Letters Patent allowed the Governor General to exercise the powers of the sovereign, but explicitly do not "transfer" the powers to the GG. They say "We do hereby authorize and empower Our Governor General... to exercise all powers and authorities lawfully belonging to Us in respect of Canada." The powers... lawfully belonging to us part is what's important here. Therefore, the Sovereign remains C-in-C by the Constitution, while the GG has been allowed to fulfill the functions of said office, and hold the title, by both the Letters Patent and the Milita Act. I'm interested, though, in where you see that the Queen can no longer declare war. The link to the Emergencies Act 1985 that you provided did not give me the Act, and a read through it here revealed nothing that revokes her power to do so. It seems to merely deal with the Governor General (note, referred to as the "Governor in Council", not "Governor General in Council") and how he/she declares a "war emergency," which, it seems, wouldn't arise unless war itself had been declared. --G2bambino 23:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * That's interesting information, thanks. I won't debate you on the issue of who is authorised to declare war (though, unless I'm really missing something, I see a "war emergency" as different to war itself), but I still maintain that the 1947 letters patent did not strip the Sovereign of any powers - nothing in them says that any part of the Constitution Act is repealed, and explicitly state that the powers belonging to the Sovereign continue to belong to them.  Thus, that, plus the fact that members of the Armed Forces continue to swear allegiance to the Queen, and not the GG, and that the Queen is still vested with all executive authority in and over Canada, would mean that she continues to be C-in-C of the forces, despite having the GG act, and be titled, as such in her place. --G2bambino 15:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Sam Sullivan
"His worship" is an honorific prefix, not a title, and should not be used in the caption. The title that comes with the Mayor's Office is "Mayor," as in "Mayor Sam Sullivan. The source you provided clearly states that "His Worship" is a "style of address"; the honorific article states that "English honorifics are usually limited to formal situations" and notes that they are only incorrectly mistaken with titles; the Your worship article states that it is used "in spoken address"; and the Style (manner of address) article specifies that it is an "oral address." According to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, honorifics "should not be included in the text inline but may be legitimately discussed in the article proper," and since your addition, it is discussed in the article. Other relevant conventions on Wikipedia are to use the most commonly associated name for the subject, and to accept a person's self-identification. The context of those are arguably somewhat different (i.e., article titles and personal identity), but they do embody a principle; I've met Sullivan and follow Vancouver city politics, and can't imagine him ever insisting, or even asking, to be referred to as something so hoity-toity. The city's website does not use "His worship," but rather Mayor Sam Sullivan, as does his official website. As for other articles that use honorific prefixes, many, if not most, don't. In any case, how other articles do something is not conclusive evidence that it is correct, but as far as that goes, the relevant comparison is not elected officials at other levels of government, but other Mayors of major Canadian cities, none of which use "His Worship." Bobanny 04:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Campassport.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Campassport.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz 14:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Card-front2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Card-front2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz 14:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Tireless contributor
Just wanted to say thanks for the barnstar! Cheers. --G2bambino 15:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Lise Thibault
According to this report he has been appointed: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/05/18/quebec-lg-070518.html. This makes sense as the earlier announcement was that Mme. Thibault would serve until after the then next election, which has since happened. --G2bambino 15:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Iii093 19950012 2 arms bcit.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iii093 19950012 2 arms bcit.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Iii057 19940014 chrest va s.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iii057 19940014 chrest va s.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Iv420 20040004 policebadge .jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iv420 20040004 policebadge .jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Iv420 20040004 arms greater.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iv420 20040004 arms greater.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:BMO_logo.png
I have tagged Image:BMO_logo.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 08:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:HKSAR.jpg
I have tagged Image:HKSAR.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 11:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Hong Kong order of precedence
You are probably right. I was actually just watching the Hong Kong 10-year ceremonies, and thought I'd change it to suit what is done in practice. Perhaps we should add that into the article, but specify it is not "officially part of the HK precedence" or something along those lines? Colipon+(T) 21:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Iv289 20010047 arms justice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iv289 20010047 arms justice.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iii093_19950012_2_arms_bcit.jpg
I have tagged Image:Iii093_19950012_2_arms_bcit.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Alpta 16:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

UBCO vs UBC O
I think that point is that UBCO is the commonly use abbreviation. The administration has specific wishes on that point indeed, but the public have not embraced them. I don't think that Wikipedia's mandate extends to supporting one agenda over the other. As for examples of common usage, see:

http://www.kelownacapnews.com/portals-code/list.cgi?paper=113&cat=23&id=1061033&more=0 http://www.city.kelowna.bc.ca/CM/Page1238.aspx

even official arms of the institution use UBCO

http://www.library.ubc.ca/ubco/ http://blog.students.ubc.ca/arc http://update.estrategy.ubc.ca/2005/09/07/live-from-kelownaits-ubco —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blalonde (talk • contribs) 20:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

SFU crest Image:CoatofArms new.jpg
A few things: + m t  21:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The image you uploaded Image:CoatofArms new.jpg is redundant to Image:SFU-Crest.png. If this crest is indeed "new", you could replace or nominate a replacement for that file.
 * 2) You uploaded the image in JPEG format, when it should probably be in PNG format with transparency for the background; see BadJPEG or ShouldBePNG for some details.
 * 3) Your image lacks a source, and I highly doubt it is a "Public domain image".

Image source problem with Image:CoatofArms new.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CoatofArms new.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. + m t  21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: UBC/SFU Coats of Arms
Hi, I apologize if my tone was taken as being rude (this wasn't my intent, but is a common perception with text-based communication and nasty deletion templates). Really what I'm trying to get at is a listing of sources (i.e., URLs) to verify credibility, and possibly improve the quality of graphics, etc. (you can probably tell already I'm no fan of JPEGs for this purpose—I try to track down a PDF or other vector format and reproduce a quality graphic if I can). Thanks for your detailed explanations about CoAs, as I was unaware that they can be legally considered PD images. I had assumed that these materials were inheritently covered by copyright, as explained in this common template Non-free symbol. Your wording just appeared suspiciously similar to images uploaded by users whom claim to have made images and "released" it to the PD, even though they just found it and wanted to pass it through. Rather than this rational, I think all you really need are: Now a few other specifics: Again, my intentions were not to delete/remove these (despite using a deletion-style template), but to include the sources so that they could be improved (graphics and/or info). Regarding the edits to the UBC/SFU articles: I restored the common logos to the top, since they are more common and identifiable (the CoAs are not); furthermore, the CoAs have (or potentially have) encyclopedic content, and it is convenient to show the CoA and text side-by-side. + m t  07:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) logo for the licensing rational (other rational I don't think are necessary for Wikipedia); and
 * 2) (most importantly) a URL to the source image, or other information on how you created the image (this is why I tagged them with Di-no source, since I had no clue where you had obtained/uploaded these images).
 * UBC: I've kept you additions to the article, except that I have converted your reference regarding the UBC CoA to a proper reference (using ), and moved your addition down in the "History" section (and I've even tagged it as a Sectstub, so it can be expanded). If you can, provide a source URL where this image is from
 * SFU: I did notice little differences, but I had no clue where you had obtained this crest image and information, which should be provided on the image page.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:19.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:19.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iv289 20010047 arms justice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iv289 20010047 arms justice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iv289 20010047 badge justic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iv289 20010047 badge justic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saanich.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saanich.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UK Royal Coat of Arms.png
Thanks for uploading Image:UK Royal Coat of Arms.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Metro Vancouver water
Your ref is correct except that it is actually the GVWD (water district) that doesn't flouridate water, this doesn't include all areas of Metro Van. Also, why is it "interesting"? Is there a more correct and neutral way to word this? Cheers, Franamax (talk) 09:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes there are eagles circling constantly :) Non-flouridation is kind of notable and I note that Water flouridation does actually mention Vancouver - but refers to Metro Vancouver! Can you think of a way to fix that ref? Franamax (talk) 09:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll see your tweak and raise you one. I think we've polished this pebble quite well :) Franamax (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speaking of Vancouver water - checked your taps lately? You need a knife and fork! This too shall pass, at least there are no locusts. Franamax (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shoulder-patch.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Shoulder-patch.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Patch design.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Patch design.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo uvic.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo uvic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Westlife
I'm not sure what you mean. There is still a good few points in the article that could do with sourcing and has been for some time. The most pressing issue would be the Personal lives section. --Neon white (talk) 06:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I do not see anything wrong with that section but I've made citations on everything that can possibly be cited. Frankly, more than 70% (before) and now 90% of the citations made in this article came from me lol --Cahk (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:NickyB.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:NickyB.gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 02:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The same message applies to Image:ShaneF.gif,‎ Image:MarkF.gif and‎ Image:KianE.gif‎. As images of living individuals, it is possible to find an existing image or create a new one which is available under a free use licence or which is in the public domain, therefore these non-free images fail the first non-free content criterion. Please ask if you have any questions. Thnaks, mattbr 18:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

From the tag on those images: "Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project." - Mdsummermsw (talk) 21:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Fullm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fullm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)