User talk:Cahlib.24

Narnia
Hi -- I've reverted your recent contributions to The Chronicles of Narnia, not because I disagree with them (actually, I think you are essentially correct), but because as they stood they constitute what we call Original Research -- i.e., your opinions, unsupported by Reliable Sources (which has a very specific meaning in Wikipedia).

Also, the tone of your additions is not what we would call "encyclopedic", but rather polemic. You are attacking, rather than reporting, a viewpoint. Wikipedia is not the place for that. We report what established authorities have to say. To rebut what you disagree with, find established authorities who rebut it and report what they say. (In the case of this article, you don't need to do that, as it has already been done farther down in the section you edited.)

And for future reference: it's "short-sighted", not "short sited".

So welcome to the chaotic, annoying, but rewarding enterprise of editing Wikipedia. I've added below the traditional welcome block. It gives online references for how to edit -- these articles are worth reading, because a lot of effort has gone into making new editors familiar with the goals and methods Wikipedia expects editors to follow. -- Elphion (talk) 04:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)