User talk:Caidencowgerprogram

Welcome!

 * }

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Caiden Cowger has been reverted. Your edit here to Caiden Cowger was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.twitter.com/caidencowger) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 19:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Now there's no article about you on Wikipedia - what are you intending to do if unblocked? Also, you haven't chosen a different username. Max Semenik (talk) 21:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to be unblocked because I truly did not mean to break Wikipedia's policy. I did it out of desperation. I don't mean to bring my personal business, but I have received over 2,000 death threats and over 7,000 hate mail messages due my stand for traditional marriage. In the article they called me homophobic, hateful, and a bigot, if I remember correctly. That is not factual information! Those are opinions. I understand that you, the administrator, might not agree with me on the issue of gay marriage, but you must realize that I was doing it to provide factual information. I have been stressed out by everything that has been going on and this has added to it. If unblocked I will have the same benefits as a regular Wikipedia user. I have not tried to create another account, because I did not want to try to trick the system. That is dishonest from my view point.
 * You haven't answered my question - please do that. Max Semenik (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I saw this unblock request, but didn't respond- if this person's only interest in Wikipedia is related to the article about him, and that article has been deleted, I don't understand why this person wants an active account on Wikipedia. I hesitate to unblock without a clearer idea of what sorts of edits would be coming from this account. In any case, this account could only be unblocked to change usernames, as the current username could be seen as promotional. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)