User talk:Caio Williams

Welcome!
Hi Caio Williams! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm VickKiang. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — Preceding undated comment added 01:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Trefor, Gwynedd Edit
Hi, I am VickKiang and I have previously reverted your edit, although you undid it again. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia and I appreciate your edits (I am pretty new as well). I would like to point out that in my opinion that your revision for the lead is inferior in constructiveness as in that based on the MoS Lead requirements, it should be concise and summarise the topic. This from my perspective is definitely not adhered to in your edit, as it is overtly loquacious and points out especially trivial aspects (Post office, Park and Football Clubs etc...). Besides, numerous of those aspects are unreferenced and does not satisfy the fundamental pillar of WP- verifiability. Furthermore, standard grammar styles should be followed, which is not the case, although I could possibly correct those somewhat straightforwardly. Nevertheless, your edit is to me somewhat unuseful and would need significant improvement, and does not manifest what you suggested "just make a few corrections and that sort of things". I likely do not have the desire to revert your edit again, as doing this repeatedly will potentially constitute an edit war. Please fix all of the issues if you can, otherwise, this type of revision might be classified as unconstructive. Thanks for your help and welcome- VickKiang (talk) 03:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Note: This has been reverted. Please do not alter the article lede again- it is not encyclopaedic and loquacious. I will add a warning for unconstructive edits. Many thanks- VickKiang (talk) 07:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

August 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wrexham, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Sources state Wrexham will not be formally awarded City Status until "later in 2022", please provide source for your edit. Announced as a city does not mean it is officially, in law, a city yet.''  Dank Jae  17:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)