User talk:Caissa89

December 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gokul Geetha Narayanan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Squinge (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * For example, do not remove the "uncategorized" template unless you add at least one category to the article, do not remove the PROD template unless you add at least one reference, and do not remove the "orphan" template unless you produce at least one incoming link to the article. Squinge (talk) 11:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Gokul Geetha Narayanan, you may be blocked from editing. Squinge (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Now that you have added some references, I have removed the BLPPROD template, but you *must not* remove the "Article for deletion" template until the discussion has concluded - see where it says "Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled". Squinge (talk) 11:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you think the person is of sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article, please present your case at Articles for deletion/Gokul Geetha Narayanan. Squinge (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)