User talk:Caitlyntetmeyer

Welcome!
Hello, Caitlyntetmeyer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing on Wikipedia
Caitlyntetmeyer, regarding this, this and this, we go by what the WP:Reliable sources state. Read WP:Reliable sources for what I mean. Biresource.net (also known as biresource.org) is not a WP:Reliable source, and it is a WP:Dead link in that it does not support what you added. And the quotes of robynochs.com does not satisfy our WP:Reliable sources guideline either. It also does not support the exact wording you added. Per WP:About self, robynochs.com only counts as a reliable source for comments about the site or author (Robyn Ochs) herself. Furthermore, what you removed the second time was not inaccurate. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

I tweaked the addition with this edit. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Biresource.org can be a WP:Reliable source in some cases, mainly for a source about itself. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Also, your statement that "However, bisexuality does not actually enforce a gender dichotomy." is part of the debate. Some argue that the term/concept does enforce a gender dichotomy and others don't. You can't add that it doesn't as a fact when there is substantial debate about the matter. What we can do is present both sides, which is what the Wikipedia article in question currently does. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)