User talk:Caj94/Elaboration likelihood model

Peer Review
I liked how you included a study to show how they were more influenced by the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence. I would suggest you add more details about why the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence was extremely higher for them to understand. This would give the reader a better understanding. The most important thing you could do to improve the article would be to add more details about the study. Other than that, great job! Peerdrew12 (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback, especially on Monroe's motivated sequence in order to give the reader a better understanding. Looking forward to adding more details about the study. Caj94 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback! We definitely will be adding more information on how the ELM connects to Monroe's motivated sequence as well as other theories! Lda12 (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

I like how you explained what your research is and how it works. However I do think that you should think about adding examples. I also think that you should add more detail on your study. Other than that you done a great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudge10 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback! Adding more examples and more details will definitely improve the article. Caj94 (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback! We plan on incorporating some examples that will better explain what the ELM is and how it is applied to every day life. Lda12 (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)