User talk:Cajackson2009

File copyright problem with File:Quadabbey.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Quadabbey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I added the tags.

Orphaned non-free image File:Belmontabbeylogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Belmontabbeylogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Belmont Abbey College
Thank you for your contributions to this article. I think you have avoided making the usual errors associated with WP:SPAM, but it may be useful to glance at that policy. I think you are connected with the college, which, so far, has proved beneficial to the article, I think.

For the record, if there is anything unpleasant in the news about Belmont, it will go there (find its way there) as well. The article must be truthful, which is not necessarily good WP:PR.

Sorry you have to be subjected to my second-guessing, but it appears that there is no one else! Student7 (talk) 23:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey there! No, thanks for all the help and the correction. I'm pretty new to this and it's great learning experience! I think I replied to you correctly... I'll post this on your page, too. :P --Cajackson2009 (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, we just got an "advert" tag, which I was supposed to help you avoid. You might ask the labeler for advice on how to proceed. Tell him you are new at this. Tell him "another editor" (me!) tried to help, but apparently not enough. You might point out that there is the Belmont_Abbey_College, hardly flattering to the school and therefore hardly "advertising." Student7 (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd go on Team5&6 or whatever they are, discussion page directly. They probably do dozens or even hundreds of articles and may not notice your comment. Ask them to tell you, saying pretty much what you have said on the article's discussion page. Be sure and point out the health care issue which is hardly advertising. Let me know when you have done this and I will add my two cents there, if you want. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I took your advice and posted something to their wall, in addition to what I posted on the Belmont Abbey College discussion page. That was actually a couple of days ago, and I haven't really been on since. I got on this morning and they have yet to respond. I'd appreciate your two cents! Thanks again for all the help. --Cajackson2009 (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * When I skimed though the article when i saw it Te monstrous list of people existed but i see that was cut down I still dont think its completely neutral but its doing much better. team6and7 (talk) 17:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sealofbelmontabbey.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Sealofbelmontabbey.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baclogoincolor.png
Thanks for uploading File:Baclogoincolor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Thehaid.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thehaid.jpg, which you've attributed to Tiffany Clark. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Studentcommonsbridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Studentcommonsbridge.jpg, which you've attributed to Tiffany Clark. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗ plicit  03:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)