User talk:Cajusdiedrich

Placodus
Another user has reverted your recent additions to Placodus on the grounds that they very closely resemble the contents of a recently published scientific paper. We are a little uncomfortable with these similarities as Wikiproject Paleontology has to ensure that plagiarized content does not make it into our articles. The information seems interesting though, and we'd like to see it put back into the article so long as we can be sure it isn't plagiarism. If you could demonstrate that the content hasn't been plagiarized or rewrite the disputed passage we can put your contribution back into the article. Thank you for contributing such timely information so quickly after the paper was published, though. We'd really like to see the information restored to the article. It's also nice seeing a new face contributing to a paleontology article. :) Abyssal (talk) 04:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)