User talk:Cak333cak333

January 2015
Hello, I'm Pcfan500. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Sebastian because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. pcfan500 (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I haven't had time to figure out where is the proper place to reply. And you are who? An authority on what is relevant? The final say in the world of wiki? You know what is and isn't pertinent and to whom it would be informative....and why? Because you were ignorant to the FACT that John Sebastian was inspired at Blair to become a songwriter. He was actually trying to write poetry and his failed attempt at that motivated him to write lyrics instead. I know this because I have met John and HE told me this....what was it?....oh yes...not constructive. Silly me....mentioning the whole reason he became a songwriter on a info page about him being a songwriter....very inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cak333cak333 (talk • contribs) 08:04, January 18, 2015‎


 * Maybe your edit would not have been undone as nonconstructive if you had not also managed to completely botch up three separate fields in the infobox. Meters (talk) 08:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

... i premised my response with the statement that i had not figured out how to use this properly yet. So instead of trying to be insulting by telling me i had done something wrong after i already admittedly stated i waa unsure as to what i was doing, maybe you could be 'constructive' by providing direction. As a first time user I felt the response i received was abrasive....that's all. Sorry it took so long to reply but I am extremely busy and have neglected my personal email for some time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cak333cak333 (talk • contribs) 05:32, February 16, 2015‎
 * That was a constructive comment, and wasn't intended to be insulting. I pointed out that you had messed up the infobox in three places and that that might be why your edit was undone. If you don't find my comment helpful then I suggest that you take it up with the editor who reverted you. Of course, after a month it's not likely he's going to see this, so you had better raise it on his talk page. Meters (talk) 05:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)