User talk:Cakaucic

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Disclosure of employment
Hello Cakaucic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to User:Cakaucic/sandbox, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cakaucic. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi There! I have disclosed my employment on my personal page (I am the Marketing Coordinator for the company I am writing about) and am trying to create an informative resource for people to go to. :Do you mind if I ask - how do other companies get their own Wikipedia pages if no one from the company is allowed to write about them? It can't all be user-generated content, correct? The content I am citing and pulling from is all content that I have either helped create or our company has previously created.


 * Thanks
 * Cakaucic (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Catherine


 * Additionally, many restaurant brands and restaurant leaders mention us in their own Wikipedia pages. For example, Danny Meyer mentions winning an award from our company as does City Barbeque.


 * Thanks!
 * Cakaucic (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Catherine


 * Thanks for your disclosure. I'll try to answer as many of these questions as I can.
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia whose articles are about notable topics - those that are of interest to the world at large and over a long period of time. We consider evidence from sources that are considered both reliable and independent of the subject to gauge this interest. There are more refined criteria for articles about companies and organizations.
 * It is important to understand that article content is summary of previously published material from sources that are reliable (have an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight) and independent (unaffiliated with the topic under discussion). Basically, Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself. We only care about what has been written about it by third parties who have no vested interest in how the company is portrayed. Primary sources are acceptable for basic facts and figures (e.g. year established, annual revenus, number of employees, names of key personnel, etc.) but not for interpretation of facts. That disqualifies all company-authored materials such as press releases, blogs and social media. Also, primary sources alone cannot establish a company's notability. Significant coverage in reliable third-party sources is required for it to be considered worthy of inclusion.
 * Editors with a conflict of interest, and in particular paid editors like yourself, are discouraged from attempting to write about topics where you have a personal or professional connection. It is difficult for these writers to adhere to Wikipedia's required neutral point of view policy, because of the incentive to write about the topic in favourable terms. It isn't prohibited outright, but your work will come under a higher level of scrutiny. It's also important to note that the subject of an article has no right of ownership or editorial control over its contents. Anyone can edit an article at any time, and article content is arrived at by consensus.
 * So to summarize, you will find it a challenge to write about your company. Creating articles on Wikipedia is a hard task, even more so for editors with a conflict of interest. I would advise that you review the links I have provided in my response. Good luck to you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

---

Hi again! Thanks for all this info - so from what I have gathered, it is not encouraged for me to write about my organization in a "selling manner." Am I able to create the page with limited details and let others add to it outside of my organization? Additionally, if other Wikipedia pages mention TDn2K, why can I not create a page for it to be linked to (i.e. Our own Wikipedia page)?

Your submission at Articles for creation: TDn2K (May 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TDn2K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TDn2K, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TDn2K Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TDn2K reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC) ---

Hi there! I included the copyright info on the image.

Thanks! Cakaucic (talk)Catherine

File permission problem with File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 20:52, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

--- Hi! I have added a note to the file page indicating that we have permission to reuse the image under the CC-BY-SA license. Thanks!

Cakaucic (talk)Catherine
 * You may have permission but we don't know that, that is why we need the permission emailed in from the copyright holder. Nthep (talk) 21:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

I have emailed the above address to let them know we have permission as the copyright owner.

Thanks, Cakaucic (talk)

Draft:TDn2K concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TDn2K, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png


The file File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

HiHasteurBot - you may delete it. If I am able to do it, I am happy to do so.

Thanks Cakaucic (talk)

File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kelli Valade - Headshot.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelli Valade


A tag has been placed on Kelli Valade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.