User talk:CalOtter/Archives/2019/February

Thank you! :-)
Hi there! Thanks for removing vandalism from. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I appreciate it very much. Keep up the great work, and I hope you have an excellent day! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

I am Grace Millane's soon to be sister in law. That is all you need — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tadders1990 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Tadders1990 - That doesn't mean anything. Not only can we not verify this, but it actually shows that you have a conflict of interest with the article subject and depending on what you're changing...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Comprehension
Presumably, you hadn't read the text you put back into the encyclopedia while falsely and disgustingly accusing me of vandalism. You should go and read it. What exactly do you think of it?82.132.222.241 (talk) 01:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I can't give my opinion on it because I don't know much about cosmology and the terms used on this page. Thus, I cannot really comprehend the meaning of the section. However, I do know that if someone removes a section with an edit summary calling it trash, it is most likely vandalism. Why do you consider that section trash? CalOtter (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you're not competent to judge the quality of some text, then when someone who is says it's garbage, you have absolutely no right to disagree. Unless you can describe, yourself, why you think the text is good enough to be in the article, don't put it there. 82.132.220.10 (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * FYI, the IP is a sock of a community-banned user whose CV is found at WP:LTA/BKFIP. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

How is that not constructive
Gonzaga has clinched a triple bye and a spot in the nit St Marys San Francisco and BYU have clinched single byes how is that unconstructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.182.235.246 (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You added it into the article with poor spacing, no commas, and the material was unsourced. I do believe it was a mistake to mark it as vandalism, and I will try not to make that mistake again in the future. Thanks! CalOtter (talk) 02:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)