User talk:Cal Umbra

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bainsford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bainsford was changed by Umbra293 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-08-03T00:05:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Football In Scotland task force
As part of WikiProject Football a new Football In Scotland task force has been set up as you edit Scottish football articles i would like to invite you to become a member if you wish. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Scottish taskforce new articles
A new article section has been set up on Scottish taskforce project page. As you are a taskforce member I would ask you to submit any new articles you create or articles you have created since the 5 August relating to Scottish football on the project page. Thank you (★☆ DUCK IS JAMMMY ☆★) 14:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of Gordon Russell (footballer)


The article Gordon Russell (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Never played or managed a team in a fully professional league, therefrore WP:NFOOTY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Gordon Russell (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gordon Russell (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gordon Russell (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 23:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Airdrie Seasons
The info on Airdrie mad for the top scorers is incorrect as i have been finding as i have been doing the season pages one by one. If you look at the last season article you will see that. It should of been finished but I've lost the will to continue the season articles at the moment.Edinburgh  Wanderer  18:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Scottish Challenge Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McShane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. When you recently edited 1883–84 Scottish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airdrie F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Soccerway stats
Hello, first of all I'd like to congratulate you for the pages related to football clubs that you have created on wikipedia. I've noticed that sometimes you use soccerway.uk as a source of a matchs' stats. I'v also seen that you create huge amounts of data in small periods of time. Is there any way of automatically creating wikipedia match stats using other sites as a source? The traditional way seems a bit too time-consuming. Thanks again for your contribution. --Txuriurdin (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Edinburgh  Wanderer  14:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Falkirk F.C.
Hi, Cal Umbra, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested for the above article at the GOCE request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi again Cal, can you please clarify the following: "When the SPL was created from the old Premier Division, a play-off match that was held between the second bottom team in the top division and the team ranked second of the First Division was abolished during the 1997–98 season." Was this play-off match between the club second from the bottom (9th?) and the club placed second in the same Division, the SPL First Division? Or was it between the clubs at 1st and 2nd positions as happens in England? I'm not into football and I find that sentence most confusing. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Baffle, yes it was the team ranked second from bottom (9th) in the Premier Division and the team ranked 2nd from the division below (First Division), with the winners earning a place in the Premier Division the next season. The team ranked last were (and still are) automatically relegated and the team who won the First Division were automatically promoted. I think what might be confusing you is the creation of the SPL. The SPL is basically exactly the same as it was beforehand when it was the Premier Division except it "broke away" from the leagues below, that's why relegation/promotion rules changed and Falkirk missed out on the play-offs. I hope that makes sense. I'll try and reword it again for you if it is still nonsense.  Cal Umbra (talk) 20:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Aha I see, thanks for clarifying that sentence - it was the term 'top division' that threw me. I understand now and I'll clarify on the article. :-) Also, non-article related - could you add a closing tag to your sig so that others' text isn't affected against their wishes?  Thanks again. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Apologies. Thanks for pointing that out!  Cal Umbra (talk) 10:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

No worries; I'm now declaring the copy-edit done; feel free to contact me about any ongoing issues, or issues arising from it. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1931–32 East Stirlingshire F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bayview Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Merchiston Park, Cal Umbra!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for that article, just reviewed it! Cheers."

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File:1995 Scottish Challenge Cup Final programme cover.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1995 Scottish Challenge Cup Final programme cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that the above also applies to some of your other uploads. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at the WP Scotland noticeboard. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 16:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Scottish Challenge Cup
I have done the GA review for the article, and placed it on hold. Nothing major, the comments should be straightforward to clear up. The review is on the article talk page. Oldelpaso (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts. I have passed the nomination. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Grahamston F.C.
Hi Cal. I've redone the headlines, bumping the three up one level; style is that after a second level headline comes a third level, not a fourth. I have no idea why i only changed one of them yesterday ~ some kind of a blip! It must have looked a bit odd, and ought to look better now. Cheers, LindsayHello 05:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Scottish Challenge Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Press and Journal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey Cal Umbra

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2002 Scottish Challenge Cup Final
The article 2002 Scottish Challenge Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2002 Scottish Challenge Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 17:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569251539 your edit] to 2012 Scottish Challenge Cup Final may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * uk/news/article/ramsdens-cup-final-ticket-info/ Ramsdens Cup Final Ticket Info], spfl.co.uk.  Scottish Professional Football League. 24 March 2012. Retrieved 19 August 2013. Falkirk

Your GA nomination of 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final
The article 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 17:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final
The article 2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 08:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1878–79 Scottish Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clyde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Gala Fairydean F.C. crest.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gala Fairydean F.C. crest.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Whitehill Welfare F.C. crest.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Whitehill Welfare F.C. crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi, at The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Request for 5 minute survey
Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 23:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Vale of Leithen F.C. crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:Vale of Leithen F.C. crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hawick Royal Albert F.C. crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:Hawick Royal Albert F.C. crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Islecroft Stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islecroft Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Islecroft Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)