User talk:CalaEdwards

I have moved your article to User:CalaEdwards/Educology as it appears to be your own personal view and is not stated in the terms we expect. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article at Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Articles for creation/Educology. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  • ɔ   ʃ   →  21:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Citation overkill
Although it's good to see you're following the advice given to you about using inline references, it's not necessary to put quite as many inline references as you have here. See Citation overkill for basic advice about how much is too much. Moreover, I don't have access to the studies you're citing, but if they are on the list simply because they use the term "educology" then it isn't really appropriate to use them to reinforce a claim about how the meaning of the term has evolved over time. But if there is more to it than that, then by all means, hold on to those sources as you may need them in the future.  — Soap  —  14:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Educology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 05:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider


 * I had some remaining concerns, as to whether some of the language was neutral, and whether it contains original research or synthesis of other works; however, I thought it best to 'accept' so that others would be likely to help develop it further. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 05:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Educology
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk) 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Edward Christensen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Edward Christensen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Edward Christensen


Hello CalaEdwards. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "James Edward Christensen".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)