User talk:Calabaun

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Dear materialscientist, My name is Raquel Caspi. Indeed my husband - Mr Matti Caspi is alive. I appreciate very much the fact you are in favor of preserving his Biography as it should be. However, as his wife, And the mother of his children - which you refused to add as part of the accuracy of my corrections, can I ask you where did you get your sources? Do you think that when I wrote that my name is RAQUEL and not RACHEL you have the right to argue with me on the spelling of my name? What about my single name before marriage? Do you think you know better than me? If I write WENGER why do you modify to WAGNER? I'm sorry but I found this behavior outrageous only because you haven't made your homework and in stead you have chosen to erase truth facts of my husband's Biography. This is a slander and a defamation of a "living person". Furthermore, I also noticed that you did not changed it back my husband's year of career ( you insisted in saying that he started in 1971 while I have corrected to 1967) I understand by that, that you did check it because it isn't his personal life ...But ignore all the evidences. Even though the information you hv posted is mostly untruth based on Gossips and tabloids and not on facts. If you need newspapers as a reference, I please ask you to correspond with me through my email. First because it easy for me, and secondly because I can provide all supporting documents which are required/needed in order to publish the truth as you yourself is in favor of. Hope to hear from you soon to fix that and to respect my dear and lovely husband, the father of our two treasures Suyan and Sean Caspi. Sincerely Yours Raquel Caspi raquelcaspi@gmail.com

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598281637 your edit] to Matti Caspi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * index3_eng.shtml Matti Caspi biography] He studied piano at the conservatory in

Your recent editing history at Matti Caspi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)