User talk:Calburg

August 2015
Hello, I'm Boccobrock. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Star Wars species (U–Z) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boccobrock • T • C 02:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Star Wars species (U–Z) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Boccobrock • T • C 02:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vurky
Hello, Calburg. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Vurky, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I noticed you removed the "proposed deletion" template on the page Vurky without an explanation of why it should be kept. If you want your page to be kept, please explain in the talk page and improve the page (with categories, references, and details). Then you can remove the template after doing that. Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, please don't remove the template if you cannot explain in the talk page. It is just simple, explain why it should be kept in the talk page, and improve the page. Then you can remove the template after doing these two simple things. Please do that. Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vurkdom
Hello, Calburg. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Vurkdom, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arlia
Hello, Calburg. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Arlia, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I noticed you removed the "proposed deletion" template on the page Arlia without an explanation of why it should be kept. If you want your page to be kept, please explain in the talk page and improve the page (with categories, references, and details). Then you can remove the template after doing that. Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, please don't remove the template if you cannot explain in the talk page. It is just simple, explain why it should be kept in the talk page, and improve the page. Then you can remove the template after doing these two simple things. Please do that. Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion
I have deleted all these articles under the criterion A1 - lacks sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. (They appear to be elements from some work of fiction, possibly one that you are writing.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)