User talk:Caldorwards4/Archive2

Image Tagging Image:Monroe1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monroe1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - SCEhard T 01:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:1002.jpg
No source. - SCEhard T 01:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Photo kmart.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Photo kmart.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - SCEhard T 01:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Images
Please do not tag obviously copyrighted images with the NoRightsReserved tag. Under US copyright law, all recent works are considered to be copyrighted ('all rights reserved') unless explicitly stated otherwise by the copyright owner. See WP:COPY for more information. Thanks - SCEhard T 01:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:1002.jpg and Image:Monroe1.jpg have also been listed at WP:PUI for the reason mentioned above. - SCEhard T 01:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Entrancewithkid.jpg - Could you please explain why this image is marked PD-self? Thanks - SCEhard T 01:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Brokerage retail 002.jpg
No source. - SCEhard T 01:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

PUI
Do not remove entries from the PUI discussion page. Doing so again will result in a block.

I am willing and glad to help with your understanding of image licenses if you would like. Just leave a message here or on my talk page! - SCEhard T 05:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Brokerage_retail_002.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brokerage_retail_002.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Spongebob
Please don't play with the List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Pronoun utc 17:35

Removing Images
Please dont remove images from the family guy pages Grande13 00:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Brendle's
Considering that you appear to be a treasure trove of information on old retail, I'm wondering if you're able to apply your expertise to the recently-created article about Brendle's. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Intercontental Hotels Group
Holiday Inn is part of the IC Hotels group brand so my change did apply.

Albertsons
I am in receipt of a complaint that you are consistently reverting all of one particular editor's changes to the Albertsons article. On review of the history I see that you always revert with the uninformative edit summary of "rv" and have not discussed this on the talk page of the article at all. Please do not revert other editor's good faith contributions with nondescript edit summaries, and make an effort to discuss your reasons for rejecting the content you are rejecting on the talk page. Thanks, Kelly Martin (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your cooperation regarding the edits for Albertsons and it's family of stores. It is very important that current and factual information is available to Wikipedia users. A suggestion for you. Consider establishing a wiki for Cerberus and its ownership of the divisions they are purchasing from Albertsons. Cerberus will acquire all County Line Liquor and Grocery Warehouse locations along with Albertsons, Max Foods and Super Saver in their respective regions.

cut-and-pasting
Hi Caldorwards. When you copy and paste content from one article into another, such as you did with 1991 Sacramento Hostage Crisis, please leave an edit summary indicating the source of the content. That way, all of the content's previous contributors are attributed (instead of just the cut-and-paster) and there is a continuous trail to follow in case the full history of the content needs to be examined. It's really a necessity dictated by the GFDL, but strangely, I can not seem to find a WP policy about it. Best regards. ×Meegs 17:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:MOVE has more info. - SCEhard <b style="color:#3D9140;">T</b> 17:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, splitting pages is mentioned parenthetically in WP:MOVE. It probably deserves more prominence, since splits-without-attribution are quite a common mistake. Thanks SCEhardt. ×Meegs 17:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I've changed the wording a bit - however since the page is on Meta I'm somewhat relunctant to make it too prominent since I don't know how it applies to other projects. - SCEhard <b style="color:#3D9140;">T</b> 18:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Incomprehensible Nicktoon nonsense
You had accidentally created the AfD discussion within the previous article (AfD for VARSYS). I cut it out, to move it to the proper article, and discovered the articles had all been speedied. For what it's worth, all that was there was your nomination and my comment. Fan1967 23:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject
Would you be interested in helping start an Idaho WikiProject? Let me know. --Faustus37 17:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kmart store.jpg
In Image:Kmart store.jpg, what location was the photo taken at? I'm curious... SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I wanted to see what you thought about it
I requested that the List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes be protected as we are having to many troubles with IP's ever since 1620050 started placing fake air dates and episodes. I think we have done all we can do, I have posted to talk pages etc. I was wondering what you thought about protecting the List of Sponge Bob Square Pants episodes. It would only be semi protection as I can't stand reverting edits. ForestH2


 * I agree on one condition. We need to take the titles and air dates on TV.com.

Emergency fucker shutoff button
Is the "Emergency fucker shutoff button" necessary? Applebob 15:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Tanyatucker1997.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tanyatucker1997.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Category addition
I wondered, since you must be a SpongeBob fan, can I add my newly created category to your user page? Marcus 16:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

What?
What do you mean by saying "Source Please" in your edit summary on the List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes? ForestH2

Image Tagging for Image:MMElogo200.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:MMElogo200.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Volleyballgirl2012
Caldorwards, If Volleyballgirl2012 is going to vandalize user pages, I can vandalize her page. And-she did have personal attacks on the user but she cut them to. ForestH2

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Caldorwards4! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. mboverload @ 06:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Tanyatucker1997.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tanyatucker1997.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
Since joining the Wikipedia you have 4,499 edits. All your edits are looking good. Do you think you'd like to become an admin? I'd love to nominate you....ForestH2

Sure go ahead. --Caldorwards4 21:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Do it later. --ForestH2

SheDAISY
Hey, Thanks a bunch for completing the singles chart for SheDAISY that I started. Where did you get the info from? I can never find anything like what you put on there. Thanks, Faris,

Image Tagging Image:Fred meyer logo small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fred meyer logo small.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 04:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Revert and a quick question
Doing the RFA for you-Anyways when reverting someone's edit it would be nice if you could provide a link to there talk page like you'll see in my List of SpongeBob SquarePants episode edit: Reverted edits by (whomever) (User talk:(whomever)\talk) to last verison by (whomever) ForestH2

The name of the SpongeBob episode is "Where's Gary?" correct? Or is it "Have you Seen this Snail?" --ForestH2

You have been blocked
You have been blocked because of a serious allegation of misconduct which has been made about your editing. Your editing behavior and other evidence lend credence to the allegations. You will remain blocked until a satisfactory resolution of this matter is reached. You may contact me by email at the address registered with my account to discuss this further. Kelly Martin (talk) 00:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, there is no way in which can help you. We do not have the power to unblock. See instructions above to contact blocking admin to resolve the issue. -- &infin;Wirelain 01:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Albertsons and Supervalu
-Caldorwards4- You are vandalizing my edits by removing correct and factual information! You have been warned once before by moderators of Wikipedia. I am encouraged by your helpfulness, but when you remove correct and factual information, you could be considered by some by removing such information for personal gain, such as the manipulation of the share price by posting false information.

Again, as in earlier posts the brands I have listed are now owned by Supervalu (as the sharholders have approved the transaction and all necessary government approvals have been received).

Furthermore, Supervalu does indeed retain ownership of Lazy Acres, Max Foods and Super Saver Foods in Southern California. In addition, your FALSE EDITS imply that Supervalu will own Albertsons in the western United States. This is so far from the truth, that I am requesting Wikipedia to begin an investigation of your removal of correct and factual information.

Just so you have it straight, Supervalu will own and operate Albertsons stores in the following states: Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah and Washington. In addition, Supervalu picks-up ownership of Albertsons stores in the following areas: Southern California, Southern Nevada, Elko, Nevada (even though it's in Northern Nevada, it's going to Supervalu), and Jackson and Rock Springs, Wyoming.

A big difference from what you keep falsely posting that Supervalu picks-up Albertsons in the "Western United States". That would mean northern California, Arizona, New Mexico and Northern Nevada (except Elko) which is so far from wrong.

Do you have knowledge that Supervalu has already sold Lazy Acres, Max Foods and Super Saver Foods in Southern California? If so, Supervalu senior executive management would like to speak with you!


 * Okay now that I came to senses to read this I belive you --Caldorwards4 01:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

caldorwards4
From your request regarding Lazy Acres, Max Foods and Super Saver, if you peruse the entire purchase transaction that was filed jointily by both Albertsons and Supervalu with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), you will discover which assets Supervalu is acquiring. 1) Supervalu is acquiring the former Albertsons Southern California Division which comprises the brands Albertsons, Max Foods and Super Saver Foods. 2) Lazy Acres was acquired by Albertsons in 2005 and has been placed under management supervision of Bristol Farms. However, the Lazy Acres name continues.

Your question as to "why" Lazy Acres, Max Foods and Super Saver Foods do not appear by "name" on the Supervalu home page or the page you linked to, my answer is that the stores mentioned have a small store count and for whatever reason, Supervalu chose not to list them.

Frustrating as it is that I have to continually edit my good faith postings from your false edits, did you notice from the link you hvae sent me that Supervalu refers to the name "Jewel"? You always remove the Jewel name from the Albertsons and Supervalu Wikipedia pages. Here's a link at Supervalu so you can see the Jewel brand name:

http://www.supervalu.com/sv-webapp/news/new_supervalu.jsp

Yes, there are Jewel-Osco stores and free-standing Jewel stores. Even though Jewel-Osco have "one" name, they are actually two separate stores with separate management, liquor and business license and union contract. This is a holdover from the first Jewel-Osco combo store opened in 1962. You as a consumer don't see any walls between the two. The "Osco" portion is not just a "pharmacy" as you attempt to portray in your discussion of Albertsons, but a retail store with several departments.

Yes, the free-standing stores have been sold to CVS/pharmacy. The Osco Drug stores that share a facility with Jewel Food Stores and have no wall between them are now owned by Supervalu.

Not trying to be hard on you, but Jewel and Jewel-Osco have a rich and storied history that has continued under the ownership of American Stores, Albertsons and Supervalu.

If you look at the Albertsons operations before the acquisition by Supervalu, many of the stores and divisions owe their parentage to the Jewel Companies, Inc.

Going forward, please be considerate when editing another users information. If you have FACTUAL evidence that it is truly incorrect, explain yourself as to why. Rampant and not thought out editing just because you may think you know the answer makes other Wikipedians upset.

I have noticed the anger from other Wikipedians from Sponge Bob Sqaure Pants. Furthermore your discussion pages have seemed to have been removed or "cleansed" by you so they no longer appear. Why hide them?

Again, your intent to update and change means well, but you need to review your edits before you post.


 * First of all I want to say I'm sorry I'm not listening to you. At first I thought you were making this all up, but then I did some looking up about what you posted and then I found out you were right . Also now I understand that Jewel and Jewel-Osco are treated as different stores. Now that I think that we are settling things up for who ever blocked me I think I deserve to be unblocked. --Caldorwards4 02:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Kelly Martin blocked you Caldorwards. I asked him about unblocking you from being banned, and then if he has to reblocking you, so your blocked for 24 hours or so, though I told him I would rather have you unblocked. ForestH2


 * caldorwards4, It's not up to me to block or unblock you. My feeling is that you are asking for redemption, but I'm not sure you really "get it" as you say you did on April 29, 2006. Shortly after you posted "I get it" on the Albertsons discussion page, you were up to your same tricks by inserting FALSE edits from what you had appeared to previously "got". Now, with your actions of the past week and the ever un-ending (rv) to my edits without explanation and adding false information about the complexities of the Albertsons transaction, it said to me one of two things....that you are attempting to post false and misleading information to manipulate the share price during the final trading days of Albertsons and the "quiet period" of Supervalu...or that you really don't have the inner knowledge of the complex and vast holdings of Albertson's Inc. My opinion is to have you blocked until you can demonstrate restraint in your edits through a very controlled and limited arena. As I peruse other retail Wikis where you have posted, I see that (to my knowledge) that much of the information you are posting is wrong or simply distorted. Yes, as ForestH2 states, you do post a great deal, but with posting a large quantity I feel that your editing resorts to wrong information. I would rather see great edits with CORRECT and FACTUAL information, vs. I think I know but not for sure information.

Unblocked
At this point, I do not believe that you were editing with the intent to manipulate public opinion of either Supervalu or Albertsons during the merger discussion. Your editing practices of late have been uncivil and you are definitely showing signs of attempting to "own" the Albertsons page. Please work harder at editing cooperatively, instead of competitively, with other editors, and remember that people who add things to an article which you don't know to be true might be more knowledgeable than yourself. Also, please try using talk pages to discuss changes you don't think are correct instead of reverting them without comment. Regards, Kelly Martin (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I was told I was unblocked but I'm still blocked what do I do? --Caldorwards4 19:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * According to the block log you are unblocked. Please try again, if it doesn't help I'll see if I can find an admin. Bjelleklang -  talk 19:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't work --Caldorwards4 19:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You may be being blocked the the autoblocker. You'll have to provide the message it's giving you when you try to edit. Kelly Martin (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

AID
Hello,

As a fellow fan of Shania Twain, I am asking you to hepl out that page's article by supporting it's nomination for an Article Improvement Drive.

Thanks, Thankyoubaby 05:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
Sorry it took so long Caldorwards. Fill out the questions and accept the nomination. Requests for adminship/Caldorwards4 --ForestH2

albertsons savons,acmesavons,jewel osco,shaws osco
I work for albertsons I was told when a customers calls to say thank you for calling albertsons savons to let people know that the name still exist.

Your RfA
Greetings - please formally accept your RfA before posting it to the RfA page (e.g., put I accept or the like on the appropriate line). A minor point, but one to which we adhere strictly. Cheers! BD2412 T 04:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)