User talk:Caleb26/Annecy

Kindly use this lovely and wonderful template to provide me with feedback
Thank you very much.

1/29/2018 Evaluation by caleb26
Overall Comments
 * Points: 0/40
 * Grade: 0%

Spelling/Grammar
Meets standard Comments

Language
Meets standard Comments

Organization
Meets standard. Comments

Coding
Meets standard. Comments

Validity
Meets standard. Comments

Completion
Nearly meets standard. Comments

Relevance
Meets standard. Comments

Overall Comments
This is a great page to edit, seeing as there is so little information on the Wikipedia page. Your edit provides great information about historical locations, with ample sources.

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds standard. Perfect spelling, I found no errors.

Language
Meets standard. Good encyclopedic tone and diction, and no contractions. Good job!

Organization
Meets standard. Great paragraphs and headers. Good job!

Coding
Exceeds standard. Lots of links to other pages, looks great!

Validity
Meets standard. Good information about these locations.

Completion
Exceeds standard. You have more than enough sources and everything looks great!

Relevance
Meets standard. I think this is the perfect amount of information about these locations, everything is relevant.

Shayla Peer Review
Hi Caleb, Spelling/Grammar Almost complete. I would suggest taking the third sentence and adding a comma and omitting a few words: “The structure has been damaged by fire several times, but was rebuilt after each occurence.” taking the fourth and fifth sentences and combining them into one to make it something like this: “It was originally owned by the Counts of Geneva, as it was designated an historical monument….” In the second paragraph, I would suggest adding the word ‘as’ to the sentence: “It was designated as an historical monument…” And I would also rephrase the final sentence to: “The exterior reflects a renaissance style, whereas the interior has a more Gothic theme.” Language Complete Organization Complete. Coding Complete. Good use of adding codes to many important words in this paragraph. Validity Complete. Completion Almost complete. Relevance This is great information. Source Nice job of using 13 sources! Citations Complete. I like how most of your sentences had multiple citations. Reference Seem neatly organized.

Well done Caleb! You did a great job on this project. Shaywah (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Shayla

2/28/2018 Evaluation by Paul E. Hubbard
Overall Comments
 * Points: 40/40
 * Grade: 100%

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds standard Looks great!

Language
Exceeds standard Looking good here!

Organization
Exceeds standard. Good Job!

Coding
Meets standard. I would probably add a link to the pages for the buildings themselves, but other than that looks good!

Validity
Meets standard. I would probably add the general location of the buildings within the city, but other than that, it looks great!

Completion
Meets standard. You have two paragraphs and ten sources!

Relevance
Meets standard. Seems relevant to me!