User talk:Caleb Doerksen

Tense
Hi there. You've done a lot of editing of tense, many times correctly showing that you understood the details of how to do it, and then many other times making the same type of edit in the opposite and incorrect way elsewhere. And you proceeded to do it for days even though people were reverting several of them as being clearly wrong. I don't even know what to say about that, except that it's documented at WP:COMPNOW and WP:TVLEAD and you need to read your Wikipedia notifications. Your opinion of market viability does not determine whether something exists; once created, it will always exist. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 19:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. ''You did it again. This constitutes disruptive editing, for which editors can be blocked.'' — Smuckola(talk) 02:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Homeland TV (TV channel)
Hello Caleb Doerksen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Homeland TV (TV channel) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Brad 02:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Homeland Télé
Hello Caleb Doerksen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Homeland Télé for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Brad 02:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced content
Hi there, re: this, if you are looking at a reliable reference, you should cite that reference. Unsourced content isn't of much value, since anyone can make up any data and slap it into an article. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Disney Junior Logo.png
Caleb Doerksen, please stop adding the File:Disney Junior Logo.png back to Disney Junior (Canada). As mentioned in my edit summary, the logo was removed as a result of. The consensus reached at the discussion link concluded that the use of this logo violates the non-free content guideline on every article except the main Disney Junior article. If you do not agree with this outcome, you are free to challenge my closure at deletion review, but you are not allowed to restore the logo until there is consensus to do so. — ξ xplicit  04:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop adding future shows in List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel (Canada) based on your EPG. It's of little interest to anyone, unsourced and random old shows are allowed to air or leave the schedule any time they want.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Chicken Little (2005 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Doc McStuffins while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Original research
Please do not add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did at Mulan II. We have two review aggregators to tell us what critics thought about a film; we don't need Wikipedia editors to also add their own thoughts on top of that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)