User talk:Calejenden

"Alternate account" of whom, please? Nobody's going to take you seriously otherwise. -- Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 20:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't care. ;-) I think you should charge my words based on what I say, not who I am. Calejenden 22:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Your decision. I'm sure ArbCom will give your comments due weight. -- Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 22:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I made my comment mostly because it seemed some editors were too easily assuming sock puppetry. Being familiar with Wikipedia can mean one of several things, like editing in another project or knowing someone who has edited somewhere and asking for advices. What I said about MatthewHoffman as an editor can be checked from his contribution history. It worries me if editors are blocked that easily, I think before blocking him in the first place 3RR should have been explained. Calejenden 23:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree with you totally, but coming from "nowhere" straight into an ArbCom look a little, er, odd. -- Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 23:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Matthew Hoffman
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Matthew Hoffman/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Matthew Hoffman/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 17:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)