User talk:Calidumpluviam

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiefstack Cogeneration Power Station has been accepted
 Tiefstack Cogeneration Power Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Tiefstack_Cogeneration_Power_Station help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Woody plant encroachment
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Biochar carbon removal
Thanks for starting the above article. In terms of wiki-fying the content, we need a strong definition reference. Do you have a good reference for BCR itself? The CEEZER article hints at an industry consultation process carried out by the EBI, but I can't find anything. Wikiwayman (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Wikiwayman Thanks for this very relevant question. The term was indeed introduced by EBI and unfortunately the only available reference is an announcement on LinkedIn. I have referenced in the article accordingly, but am happy about suggestions on how to go about this alternatively. Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 06:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Brilliant. That's exactly what I was hoping for. A lot of the available background material refers to Pyrogenic_carbon_capture_and_storage and I can see that the EBI expect that over time "BCR" will replace "PyCCS" as the term used when discussing the technology. At some point, I think it will be necessary to merge the PyCCS and BCR articles (unless there is a consensus here that they are different enough to keep them as two articles). For now, I think we need to add crosslinks to PyCCS and BCR on each page so that the reader can be fully informed about this developing field. Wikiwayman (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Wikiwayman That is a very valid point. Admittedly, I was note aware of the article on PyCCS. I like the suggestion to crosslink the two articles for now. I will monitor the developments and if there will be no sufficient differentiation between PyCCS and BCR, we can merge the articles. I see that some industry stakeholders have started using the combined abbreviation "PyCCS/BCR" in their publications. In the end BCR might become the preferred term to market respective credits (due to the better simplicity of the term), while PyCCS remains the preferred scientific term.Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I have merged - hope you can continue to improve Chidgk1 (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. I have started working on the article and will continue to do so.Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

AI generated lead on Biochar article
Felt like I should notify you, in case it wasn't AI generated. Someone tagged the new lead section for Biochar that you added as AI-generated, and I removed it (it did sound like it was AI generated, and people usually keep aspects of the previous lead when editing). The new lead section also lacked a lot of interesting, cited information that the old one had. LLMs are generally not considered reliable sources by Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Mrfoogles (talk) 18:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for the heads up. The edit was indeed done with the help of LLM and I now see why that was not adequate for the purpose. Well spotted. The old lead section however also had severe shortcomings. I have now manually reviewed it once more. I hope the new version finds approval and/or can still be enhanced. I appreciate your direct message on this talk page, I would not have taken note of the discussion otherwise. Calidumpluviam (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)