User talk:Californianinexile

You beat me by 8 minutes
For updating Sabato's Crystal Ball's House ratings. HotdogPi 19:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Endorsements_in_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Endorsements_in_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Joe_Biden_2020_presidential_campaign_endorsements check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Joe_Biden_2020_presidential_campaign_endorsements?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Joe_Biden_2020_presidential_campaign_endorsements check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Joe_Biden_2020_presidential_campaign_endorsements?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Broken references
When you delete candidates from 2020 United States Senate elections, please save the references. I've recovered them from your last deletion here. Thanks! —GoldRingChip 21:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect Deletion of Candidates
You have incorrectly deleted "Carl Beach" from the candidates in Wyoming for the 2020 United States House of Representatives elections. In the notes, please explain why. Thanks. Thefluidaffect (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

This is a consistent problem you seem to have. At least use edit summaries. Smith0124 (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

2020 United States gubernatorial elections.
Hi,

Can you please explain why you are reverting the color coding on 2020 United States gubernatorial elections? Everyone else seems to be fine with it and it took hours of work. Please stop reverting and discuss it with me. If it is just the candidates on the Washington state portion that is a problem, you can add them back as long as they are color coded. My issue with the list was that it included dozens of candidates which is highly unusual, so I only kept those that had other sources. Smith0124 (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Abductive (reasoning) 20:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

At the very least, an edit summary should explain why you are removing large blocks of content
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.

Per WP:BRD, you also need to be willing to communicate with other editors on the talk page if your changes are disputed. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Blocked 24 hours for not following WP:BRD (edit-warring, not communicating with other editors)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions
-- Cabayi (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2020 United States Senate elections) for a period of 6 months for reverting edits without explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If the only way to get you to play nice is to keep you off that article 'til after the election... so be it. Leave edit summaries. Observe the bold-revert-discuss process. Stop edit warring. Cabayi (talk) 11:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you block him from the 2020 United States gubernatorial elections too? He/she is doing the same thing there. Smith0124 (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * is probably the best way forward, IMO. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 202011041200 for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note ✅ socking via .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 20:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * User:Ponyo Thanks for taking care of this. In light of your confirmation, should the indef sockblock be converted to a CU block, and should the user be tagged?
 * I'm not going to tag the account as a master unless there is additional socking. They're already blocked indef, I don't see the benefit of switching to a CU block in this case.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)