User talk:CaligaNox

Welcome!

 * }

Feedback dashboard
Hi,

Regarding your comment on the Feedback dashboard,, don't get overly discouraged! I tried out the reference you added, and it didn't open in my browser. Maybe that is the reason your additions were removed. Everything that is not well referenced can be removed. You can discuss any problems you are having regarding the reversion of your edits on the article talk page and seek to resolve the problems.

Best wishes, KennethSides (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Satanism
Responding to your message.

I don't think I know which issue you're talking about. How is the Golden Dawn relevant? If you have any improvements to make to that article then please, feel free to do so.

I removed the addition of Ordo Serpentis into the Satanism article since the mere fact that it's a Satanic order that's active in 2011 does not make it notable enough to even be mentioned. (Like if I started an "order" with highschool friends and pretended we're a big deal, should I add that order into the article as well?) I have personally never heard of them, and I could just google the name right now to see for myself -- but that's not my job. The proof of their notability should've been included in the edit. Why are they relevant, why are they important? Don't explain that to me, add that into the edit. — Jean Calleo (talk) 23:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)