User talk:CallMeBarcode

Janet Lee Stevens
I have moved your draft article on Janet Lee Stevens back to User:CallMeBarcode/sandbox2 ‎ as it is not ready for article space - please see Help:Referencing for beginners for how to format and include references. I have NOT assessed whether the subject is notable enough for an article, or any other aspect, as to do so, until the references have been formatted correctly, is very difficult - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! I will work on it. I had citations but they didn't carry over. I am learning the ropes! CallMeBarcode (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Janet Lee Stevens
Hello! Your submission of Janet Lee Stevens at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Yoninah, this is very helpful. I will respond to your suggestions on the DYK page and in enhancing the opening paragraph in a few days once I get past some deadlines.CallMeBarcode (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

I expanded lead section and hope this more adequately reflects the article.CallMeBarcode (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, it has been nearly a month since I posted on your nomination. Please reply within a week or this nomination will be closed as stale. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Apologies! I thought I had replied and was waiting for a response. I also extended the first paragraph of the article to make it more accurately reflect the whole -- does it look OK now? I will go to the DYK page now. Thank you for following up. CallMeBarcode (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response. I'm calling on a new reviewer to check ALT2 -- see the nomination page. I also removed the tag on the article and did a little editing/wikifying. BTW the lead is a summary of the main points of the article. You do not have to include citations for uncontroversial information in the lead when that information is also cited in the main text. Best, Yoninah (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Good to know about not having to use citations for uncontroversial info in the lead. Thanks also for fixing its format. I've got to figure out how to get more training in "doing" Wikipedia. It still seems rather arcane... CallMeBarcode (talk) 13:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Janet Lee Stevens) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Janet Lee Stevens.

User:Cwmhiraeth while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I really appreciate that you reviewed the article and liked it. CallMeBarcode (talk) 08:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Notre-Dame de Paris fire
CallMeBarcode ~ nice to meet you. Thank you for your edit here, but per the articles talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire/Archive_2#Do_we_need_the_table_of_%22list_of_known_donations%22? here] and here {which deals with the fundraising section} ~ is maybe a reason why undid your edit ~ the only other thing I noticed {very good edit by the way} is you left out a source ~ If I or Masem can help you out in any way please feel free to reach out to one of us ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 19:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Janet Lee Stevens
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of JUDITH KATZIR
Hello! Your submission of JUDITH KATZIR at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Judith Katzir
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Elin C. Danien
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nili Rachel Scharf Gold


A tag has been placed on Nili Rachel Scharf Gold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Antila333 (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Sophia Wells Royce Williams
Dear CallMeBarcode,

I appreciate the work you're doing, but I didn't delete Sophia Wells Royce Williams. I just made it a draft for you to work on it until it's ready. When you're done with it let me know and then I can move it back to the main article space.

Thanks,

– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 22:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Food in the Middle East
Thanks for your contributions in the area of food in the Middle East, an area which interests me quite a bit -- among other things, I started the article Ibn Sayyar al-Warraq 13 years ago. I'm also a big supporter of college courses which teach students to research and write for Wikipedia -- though both the doing and the teaching are harder than they look!

I wanted to explain my recent edits to Nawal Nasrallah. I know you've contributed to it, but I don't know how much of the current text is yours. The article sounded a bit too much like a magazine feature article or even a publisher's blurb rather than a WP article, which tends to have a drier and more concise style. For example, personal tidbits like her husband's studies and her work as a seamstress seem out of character for a WP article, as do her difficulties in finding a publisher -- something that is noteworthy in the article on J.K. Rowling, but just doesn't seem noteworthy here. Other editors may or may not agree with me on this.... --Macrakis (talk) 17:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Annie Guo VanDan
Hello, CallMeBarcode,

Thank you for creating Annie Guo VanDan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"References about the magazine do not count as sources giving notability to Annie Guo VanDan. We need more references about this person. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for this feedback - I understand. In my original draft I put references to the magazine as links, not citations. Would that be a better option for this stage of the article, as research for further references continues? Thanks again for your advice. CallMeBarcode (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duleep Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Sikh War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivy Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multitasking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hélène Jawhara Piñer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hélène Jawhara Piñer, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Hélène Jawhara Piñer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)