User talk:CallanGrey1972

Ways to improve Conor Brian Quinn
Hi, I'm WMartin74. CallanGrey1972, thanks for creating Conor Brian Quinn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for your page creation, i have added some tags to the page to improve its quality.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. WMartin74 (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

3/2/2014

Hi I'm WMartin74, made some amendments re category and 'orphan' links. Just wondering if the changes work? Kind regards. Callan. CallanGrey1972 (talk) 10:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Overview of New Zealand Historical Fiction
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Overview of New Zealand Historical Fiction, may be copied from http://historicalnovelsociety.org/new-zealand-historical-fiction/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Conor Brian Quinn


The article Conor Brian Quinn has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to establish notability. No reliable third-party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Conor Brian Quinn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conor Brian Quinn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Conor Brian Quinn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 21:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
I have been blocked for completely the right reason and believe the time allocated for my block is fair. I apologise unreservedly for my actions and I will not be using multiple accounts again. However, I must admit that it was fun trying to see if I could get away with it and I am surprisingly happy that I was caught, as it shows the system does work. I have also learned a great deal about the Wikipedia 'process' in terms of editing and creating new pages as a result of this experience and am much more likely to contribute meaningful articles and edits now that I know the process is robust. I will also continue to work on the Conor Brian Quinn article and would be most appreciative if an administrator could copy it to my sandbox should the page be deleted before my edit block expires :) CallanGrey1972 (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)