User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 11

1RR experiment
1RR on all pages begins now, expires Tuesday. Failure to adhere to the terms will incur, let's say, in a week-long block. Just don't forget. But if you do forget, you are allowed to self-revert, so don't stress it. El_C 07:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Arbitration/Requests/Case
You are invited to join the discussion at Arbitration/Requests/Case. where a request for Arbitration has been filed where you are named as a party. Amortias (T)(C) 21:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration declined
Hi Callmemirela;

I'd just like to tell you that a request for Arbitration regarding you has been declined by a vote of the Committee.

For the Committee, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 23:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

KathleenLight article peer review
Hi, I see that you have edited on Jaclyn Hill's page. Would you mind taking a look at my draft page about the YouTuber, KathleenLights. Here it is.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rheab16 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Progress update - Good news is I have started; Bad news is there's more work now then when I started... (don't panic, it's mild)
Thought I'd leave you a note that I've started working on the various modules and templates I need to get you the overarching template that you desire. For that matter I have good and bad news. The bad news is that I underestimated the number of templates that I'd need to make this work. The good news is that the templates I need are single sentence and just invoke one of the big module's functions. The module for color that I'm building is multi-function, but, I need a template to invoke each function separately. It's mostly just a template to invoke the correct colour. So one template invokes the first color, the second will invoke the second, the third the third, and the fourth the fourth. Thanks for all your patience. I have the module/data page up and running, I hope to get the header template (game log) up and running tomorrow. Then I will work on getting the big module at least partially ready by the end of the week. I'll do some testing on the weekend so that I can get the colors to work. From there it's just a matter of converting the table into a simpler template. I'll give you a second update on Friday. Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * New update - I said Friday, but, many things have happened. Alright, so the module is live as a "pre-alpha". So far I have a functioning header template, however, it's not in the style that you would like. For the time-being I haven't been able to work out how to manipulate the module so that the first three colors are used instead of the first two. Below are a few examples of what it looks like with different teams and different parameters in effect; Mr rnddude (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note; the template will force itself to the bottom of the page, I don't know how to lock it in place. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * This is Mirela. I am on a wikibreak and I used the enforcer, so I can't log in. I just wanted to thank you for your help. Have you thought about reaching out to active users with expertise on Wikipedia's templates? Maybe that should help. 96.20.100.190 (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * All good about the wikibreak. Modules and Templates are somewhat different. I'd need somebody who is good with modules. If I can't work out how to manipulate it over the next couple days then I'll be try posting on Lua:Help talk page. It's really about identifying that one line that is messing with you. I spent an hour trying to figure out why the module wasn't functioning at all and it was literally that I had typed "stripwhitesearch" instead of "stripwhitespace" in one line. It's a fairly small module, whatever is causing it is one a page that is shorter than this thread. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Lol, it happens to me all the time. Let me know of any other updates should you have any. 96.20.100.190 (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am a genius. Behold the now accurate game log header with the glorious team tri-colours. I'll probably have to re-order the colours for some teams so that we don't have contrast issues (i.e. dark brown background with black letters), but, other than that we should be good to go. I am immensely pleased that by sheer luck I found a way to manipulate the template instead of the module. I've also started making the game log template. I'll be cutting out some of the useless fluff and deleting one template that I won't need. I've crested the mountain and it should be mostly smooth sailing from here. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Just when I thought I had it all worked out. I have two problems, one that is my own fault which I am finally able to view for the first time on your page but it won't show up at Template:NHL game log start/doc - which I've already fixed - and the other which I haven't been able to fix in any way. The expression should have substituted itself with "Pre-season" or any month inputted. It works on the similar NBA template, but, not at all on this one. I've spent several hours cleaning up tiny little errors, but, nothing is actually impacting on this. I don't think I have any errors left and it still doesn't work. Oh it's so frustrating having one minor thing between you and completion. Literally, if I could just get the switch expression to work your template would be ready. Maybe minor fiddling with colors and the such but otherwise all yours. I'll try get it to work tomorrow. Feel free to play around with colors and test the template out on your page. I'll let you know when it's article ready - hopefully tomorrow. Mr rnddude (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I think Template:NHL game log section is missing the recap section. Each game is recapped and sourced on the article. Unless your intention is including the schedule link from the team into the game log text as source? 96.20.100.190 (talk) 04:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah... no I just missed the "pts" and "Recap" from the template. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * New Update; Can I get your review of the template. Any features I've missed or anything you'd like me to try and include for further simplification. This is a copy of the 2016-17 Montreal Canadiens Regular Season table for the month of October and November, except substituted with the templates refactored to purpose.


 * - style="background:#cfc
 * 1 || October 13 || Montreal || 4–1 || Buffalo || || Al Montoya || 19,070 || 1–0–0 || 2 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fff"
 * 2 || October 15 || Montreal || 3–4 || Ottawa || SO || Montoya || 18,195 || 1–0–1 || 3 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 3 || October 18 || Pittsburgh || 0–4 || Montreal || || Montoya || 21,288 || 2–0–1|| 5 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 4 || October 20 || Arizona || 2–5 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 3–0–1 || 7 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 5 || October 22 || Montreal || 4–2 || Boston || || Price || 17,565 || 4–0–1 || 9 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 6 || October 24 || Philadelphia || 1–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 5–0–1|| 11 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 7 || October 26 || Montreal || 3–2 || NY Islanders || || Montoya || 12,194 || 6–0–1 || 13 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 8 || October 27 || Tampa Bay || 1–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 7–0–1|| 15 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 9 || October 29 || Toronto || 1–2 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 8–0–1 || 17 || Recap


 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 10 || November 2 || Vancouver || 0–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 9–0–1 || 19 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 11 || November 4 || Montreal || 0–10 || Columbus || || Montoya || 14,436 || 9–1–1 || 19 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 12 || November 5 || Philadelphia || 4–5 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 10–1–1|| 21 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 13 || November 8 || Boston || 2–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 11–1–1 || 23 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 14 || November 10 || Los Angeles || 1–4 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 12–1–1 || 25 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 15 || November 12 || Detroit || 0–5 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 13–1–1 || 27 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 16 || November 13 || Montreal || 2–3 || Chicago || || Montoya || 21,762 || 13–2–1 || 27 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fff;"
 * 17 || November 15 || Florida || 4–3 || Montreal || OT || Price || 21,288 || 13–2–2 || 28 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 18 || November 18 || Montreal || 2–3 || Carolina || || Montoya || 12,101 || 13–3–2 || 28 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 19 || November 19 || Toronto || 1–2 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 14–3–2 || 30 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 20 || November 22 || Ottawa || 4–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 14–4–2 || 30 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 21 || November 24 || Carolina || 1–2 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 15–4–2 || 32 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 22 || November 26 || Montreal || 2–1 || Detroit || OT || Price || 20,027 || 16–4–2 || 34 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 23 || November 29 || Montreal || 1–2 || Anaheim || || Price || 14,830 || 16–5–2 || 34 || Recap


 * You can also use it like so (look at source code);


 * - style="background:#cfc
 * 1
 * October 13
 * Montreal
 * 4–1
 * Buffalo
 * Al Montoya
 * 19,070
 * 1–0–0
 * 2
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#fff"
 * 2
 * October 15
 * Montreal
 * 3–4
 * Ottawa
 * SO
 * Montoya
 * 18,195
 * 1–0–1
 * 3
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 3
 * October 18
 * Pittsburgh
 * 0–4
 * Montreal
 * Montoya
 * 21,288
 * 2–0–1
 * 5
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 4
 * October 20
 * Arizona
 * 2–5
 * Montreal
 * Price
 * 21,288
 * 3–0–1
 * 7
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 5
 * October 22
 * Montreal
 * 4–2
 * Boston
 * Price
 * 17,565
 * 4–0–1
 * 9
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 6
 * October 24
 * Philadelphia
 * 1–3
 * Montreal
 * Price
 * 21,288
 * 5–0–1
 * 11
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 7
 * October 26
 * Montreal
 * 3–2
 * NY Islanders
 * Montoya
 * 12,194
 * 6–0–1
 * 13
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 8
 * October 27
 * Tampa Bay
 * 1–3
 * Montreal
 * Price
 * 21,288
 * 7–0–1
 * 15
 * Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 9
 * October 29
 * Toronto
 * 1–2
 * Montreal
 * Price
 * 21,288
 * 8–0–1
 * 17
 * Recap
 * 1–2
 * Montreal
 * Price
 * 21,288
 * 8–0–1
 * 17
 * Recap
 * Recap


 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 10 || November 2 || Vancouver || 0–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 9–0–1 || 19 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 11 || November 4 || Montreal || 0–10 || Columbus || || Montoya || 14,436 || 9–1–1 || 19 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 12 || November 5 || Philadelphia || 4–5 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 10–1–1|| 21 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 13 || November 8 || Boston || 2–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 11–1–1 || 23 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 14 || November 10 || Los Angeles || 1–4 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 12–1–1 || 25 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 15 || November 12 || Detroit || 0–5 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 13–1–1 || 27 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 16 || November 13 || Montreal || 2–3 || Chicago || || Montoya || 21,762 || 13–2–1 || 27 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fff;"
 * 17 || November 15 || Florida || 4–3 || Montreal || OT || Price || 21,288 || 13–2–2 || 28 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 18 || November 18 || Montreal || 2–3 || Carolina || || Montoya || 12,101 || 13–3–2 || 28 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 19 || November 19 || Toronto || 1–2 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 14–3–2 || 30 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 20 || November 22 || Ottawa || 4–3 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 14–4–2 || 30 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 21 || November 24 || Carolina || 1–2 || Montreal || || Price || 21,288 || 15–4–2 || 32 || Recap
 * - style="background:#cfc;"
 * 22 || November 26 || Montreal || 2–1 || Detroit || OT || Price || 20,027 || 16–4–2 || 34 || Recap
 * - style="background:#fcc;"
 * 23 || November 29 || Montreal || 1–2 || Anaheim || || Price || 14,830 || 16–5–2 || 34 || Recap
 * Personally, I prefer the first style as it uses less space, but, the second style is quicker to follow. I can only really think of one (maybe two) more thing(s) that could be done that would make the article look cleaner with these tables. The first is to transclude the entire table from a template. Pros; Would take up no more than a couple lines of prose in the article - Cons; Would require three template pages per team per season; 3 templates (pre-season, regular season and playoffs) x 30 teams = 90 template pages per year. Note, there's 100 seasons in NHL history at this time (1917 to 2017) plus 9 seasons as the NHA, and then how many more going back to 1887 first AHAC season. Ok, this is assuming that everybody and their grandmother is happy with this style and it ends up being used NHL wide and not just for the Habs. The only other thing that comes to mind that might be possible is to have one more template for each game result which might reduce the length of each entry into a single line with fewer || and shorter links. Other than that, I can't think of anything more to do. Feel free to ping me if you have any ideas of your own. I might also be able to get the background to be automatically coloured based on the game result. Though, I can't promise that I'll be able to work out how to do this. I have an idea of how to code up a template that can read a game result and decide who won. It'd be something like "if a > b then game won" and "if b > a then game loss". The thing is, how do I factor in OT game loss into this. Sorta like if "a > b then game won", "if b > a then game loss", but, "if b > a and OT parameter filled, then game_overtime/shootout_loss". Oh yeah, and one more thing, I am trying to work out how to get the legend to fit in as well. I'll probably dump it into the "game log end" template and remove the schedule link or get them to work simultaneously. Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, the legend and the schedule link are now working in tandem and the legend is now part of "game log end". Mr rnddude (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ya know, Ive only just now read your header about your wiki break and request for email contact. Now I feel dumb. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ahaha, it's okay. To reply to frankly lengthy post, I am not sure which template I prefer. The first is the one every season article uses ( || ); however, I also find it a bit confusing. They are too many bars. The second one seems to be easier to follow and they aren't so many bars. I am a little torn. I am not sure what you mean by "90 templates pages per year" since TV shows (and there are plenty of them) that have the episode table. I think 90 templates/year is nothing compared to over 500 TV show articles. As for the automatic wins and losses, I'm for it, but let's give the template a few before trying something new. I have nothing else to comment on. 96.20.100.190 (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
 * 🇯🇵 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
 * Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
 * Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Hildegard Trabant
Dear Mirela,

I noticed on your User Page that you like to translate Wikis from English to French. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could translate Hildegard Trabant's page. Thank you in adavance! Brewer Bob (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification
I'm giving you a courtesy notification of a report made at WP:ANI against, in which you have witnessed. The discussion is talking place at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Kind regards,  Wes Wolf Talk 05:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Gracias for the notification (: Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  16:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chicago PD season 4 poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Chicago PD season 4 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Latest Orchomen sock
Hi Callmemirela, thanks for helping with the clean up of that latest sock. Please note that typo-fixes like this and other clearly helpful changes should not be reverted, per WP:BANREVERT. I just undid a few of your reverts, hope you don't mind. Sro23 (talk) 01:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't need my permission. I understand (: Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  01:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Callmemirela,, I see you guys are having fun. Please be sure to update the sockpuppet list each time you encounter a sock if you can. Thanks! Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 04:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Graphic Ratings
And the graphic of or etc... is it sourced ? Really ? Why are you for his graphics and not the others ? It would be necessary to stop a little bit to do "series favoritism" and to choose which one should have or not, each series is free to obtain, moreover the principle of Wikipedia is to teach us things and there Has nothing wrong with having a fluid graphic and understandable under the eyes.

Sorry for my english --178.197.231.74 (talk) 13:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I actually didn't bother to check their contributions again, so I wasn't aware that other TV series had it. I was also busy with another discussion and on my way to school. Actually, readability is very important, which is why we have WP:COLOR. Callmemirela  &#127809;  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  13:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The template are all listed for deletion, with reasons listed. Please contribute to the discussion on the deletion page instead of forcing the edits. --  Alex TW 13:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Copy edit tag on Lauren Southern
Well, I went through and did a quick ce of the page and it should be good to go. But I think you may have been premature in tagging because there was actually not that much that required revision. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ  15:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with tagging a copyedit template. It just needed a little work and it could have been easily removed. I don't see how it's premature? Ps: I love your signature.  Callmemirela   &#127809; talk 20:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Signature
Hi, I just voted below you in an RFA. I use this syntax highlighter, and your signature caused it to highlight everything below your signature, making the highlighting useless. Could you please swap the final span and font tags in your final talk page link (so it reads )? The highlighter expects all html tags to be closed in the reverse order they are opened. Thanks. kennethaw88 • talk 18:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh my god, I hadn't noticed that mistake. Thanks for letting me know. I'll fix it right now.  Callmemirela   &#127809; talk 19:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Defaultsort
Hi. Just a note to let you know that you should add Template:DEFAULTSORT for certain articles such as all The Fosters season articles you created. This will ensure that they are sorted under "F" in the category page instead of "T". Bennv3771 (talk) 15:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I was finally able to read your message. Thank you for the notice.  Callmemirela   &#127809; talk 03:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Comment: Thank you!
We don't know each other which adds to the mystery. Nonetheless, I wanted to take the time to thank you for your recent impartial comments in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I hope I can do the same in your behalf, if ever needed. Thank you again!———→StephenTS42 (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Farrah Alexander
Hello Callmemirela. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Farrah Alexander, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''clearly claims significance. Use WP:AFD if notability is not established.''' Thank you.  So Why  20:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Template:Television ratings graph‎
Looks like we're going to have to continue dealing with invalid and pointless usages of Template:Television ratings graph‎, as the closing admin is more than likely going to see the number of Keep votes and assume a consensus. Great. /s --  Alex TW 13:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe would it be best to add a note for the closing admin to tell them that maybe keep !votes are WP:IDONTLIKEIT? We have a lot of "It's useful" and such. Aside from that junk, we have maybe 5 actual real keep !votes.  Callmemirela   &#127809; talk 14:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

 * It was my pleasure :)  Callmemirela   &#127809; talk 15:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)