User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 6

Spinningspark
Callmemirela, why did you revert an edit by another user on my talk page? If you had a good reason for doing this, you should have explained in the edit summary. If it was a mistake, perhaps you would like to self-revert. SpinningSpark 09:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. I reverted because the message was rather random and the user had been leaving vandalism-like messages on other talk pages. If you want it to be restored, you can revert me. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  15:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure what point the user is making, and it might possibly be off-topic chat, but it does vaguely relate to articles I have recently been editing or reviewing. I'm usually grateful to those who patrol my talk page and fix vandalism, but even if this post were off-topic, I don't see that it rises to being vandalism.  Also, looking at their other posts, I don't think editors have been selected at random.  I'm quite capable of deciding what posts to remove as off-topic myself and would rather things like this are just quietly ignored.  If you really thought this was vandalism, you should have marked the edit summary as such and warned the user.  Deleting their posts without explanation is confusing to me and off-putting to a new user. SpinningSpark 16:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * As I have said, you may revert me if you want. It is your talk page. I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  16:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "like" in titles, a question in which you previously participated at "Love Me like You Do". Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Llywelyn II   04:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for informing me. I will comment as soon as I can. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  07:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
ApprenticeFan work 02:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just a little notice: this message was unnecessary. I have the article on my watchlist and I would had known that you answered. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  03:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Dirty Grandpa box office
I haven't edited the Dirty Grandpa page since the first warning. I saw it edited with the foreign page too but didn't change it or alter it since. I have better things to do than math on a box office page haha... TropicAces (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces
 * This diff says otherwise. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  17:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * yeah, my bad, I went back and checked and remembered I did do the overall figures. That's on me. Like I (edited) said, I won't touch it again. TropicAces (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces

Happy New Year, !


Happy New Year! , Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter


That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by, and two each by , , , and. Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by. Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. ,, and --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)
Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. ,, and .--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for helping with Loudon Park Cemetery today. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

RE:Copyrighted to Fifty Shades Darker (film)
Say exactly where is the literal copy of the text that you say there according to copyright? Because if it says here, specify in which paragraph it was copied?

As because the text it was copied with my arguments and not on that page. --186.84.46.227 (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Please keep in mind that not all copyright text come from the source they indicate. Now, for the copyright, please refer yourself to the table below:


 * The use of the words are too similar. It's easy to copy-paste your edit into Google's search bar and see the similarity it shows.I hope this clears everything. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  00:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the note
Thank you for the note. Just to be clear, I wasn't canvassing. I am asking for help at me articles being repeatedly targeted by one user. New to this world. AM (talk) 04:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, you were canvassing. Please read WP:CANVASS. It consists of inviting/informing users of discussions in a biased way, like you did on talk pages. That is canvassing and such actions are condemned on Wikipedia. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  10:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok AM (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

What TVCAST says
Hi Mirela, MOS:TVCAST says to not give episode counts. It does not say not to give which episode(s) an actor appears in. If an actor only appears in a few episodes (1–3), it is helpful (and permissible) to give which ones they are. There was a discussion about whether or not to include them, but no consensus was found against it. Thanks. —Musdan77 (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Michael Palardy
Hi. Thanks for patrolling new pages, and essential and under-appreciated task, but your tags on Michael Palardy were not right: This may seem like nitpicking, but it's important to choose the right tags, so that the newbie author understands how to do better next time. The best thing to do here was probably {{subst:Prod blp}}, giving the author a week to add a reference and, hopefully, some content. What I have done is, move it to Draft:Michael Palardy and tell the author what it needs.
 * WP:CSD is for articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article, but the subject was clear - this guy Palardy. You could make a case for WP:CSD no content since there is only the infobox, but there is enough in it to show that this is a potential article.
 * WP:CSD - playing for the Carolina Panthers is a claim of significance, in fact it is enough for notability under WP:NGRIDIRON.

Keep up the good work! There is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Oki doki. Thank you. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  19:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 May newsletter


Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by and one by ), four Featured Lists (with three by ), and 53 Good Articles (six by  and five each by, , and ). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by and five by ). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. scored 265 base points, while and  each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, and, broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. ,, and -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Shailene woodley and jessica luca's races
Could you add both Shailene and Jessica's race on both of their articles and add each of the source from ethniccelebs.com. I'm not familiar to everything on wikipedia. It's always important to know or add someone's race, if you can. Oh and by the way, could you fix the timeline table on the article for the haves and the have nots tv show, you know the table that shows which season a character was main, which season they appeared in, etc. Thanks! Zhyboo (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ethnicelebs is an unreliable source and will therefore not be used. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  12:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Actually it is realiable, in certain occasions. Most of the stuff on the site is. Zhyboo (talk) 00:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it is not. The site even claims itself to be false and fake. Please see the discussion I opened on a noticebaord. Your understanding of reliable sources is very misleading. Please see WP:RELIABLE. Secondly, just because you believe it is reliable does not mean it actually is. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  00:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Well find some reliable source!!!! And why does ethniccelebs claim their stuff to be false? Zhyboo (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know. That's not my problem. Secondly, adding this content is not my job. Per WP:BURDEN, you are responsible of finding reliable sources yourself, not me. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  01:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Though some of their stuff is false, some of its true
On ethniccelebs, they said actor Jacob artist had an African-American father and polish mother, turns out on another website, it's true. He has a Black dad and polish mom. And Shailene is mixed with black and creole and jessica luca's stated she really did have a Black dad and white mom, and ethniccelebs said not EVERYTHING may be accurate, but some of it is, so don't start an argument with me and just add the source back, it's realiable because both stated their races, and jessica said it herself, it's either you or someone else, because I've never learned how to add source, I'm new to certain things! Zhyboo (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have said before, and you refuse to listen, EthniCelebs is unreliable. Period. If you have any concerns over this, please take it to a noticeboard. I am not going to add to the source. It's not my responsibility. "So don't start an argument with me"? Really? That comment was really unnecessary. You are not the king/queen of Wikipedia, so please don't give me the impression of such. Plus, don't tell me what to do. Either you add yourself or not at all, I am not doing it. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  01:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

You were the one acting like the queen of Wikipedia when I went to ashley, asking her to add source. Like I said, some of the stuff is factual, on the website, some of it isn't. So I guess the fact that not everything on ethniccelebs is factual, that's what makes it unreliable. 😐 Zhyboo (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * May I ask exactly how I was acting as the Queen of Wikipedia? After being told that EthniCelebs is unreliable, you went on to post on somebody else's talk page asking same thing you did to me, which constitutes of bordering of violating WP:CANVASS. I am just abiding by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. EthniCelebs is unreliable and that's final. Until you find a reliable source, the content will not be added. Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm pushing your buttons, really???
By the way I'm a guy and to the fact that you're a female, I'm not trying to upset you or push your buttons. Anyway, I'm not trying to push your buttons, in general, i keep asking you how is it unreliable when some of the information is true in the site. I just wanted a simple answer, that's all, and I won't mention it again. Zhyboo (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)