User talk:Calmspeak

Repost of Nick Hinton
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 16:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've no intention of ignoring your message, but can only reiterate on what is said above: the article was deleted following a discussion on Articles for deletion, which can be found here, and the reposted article was not different to the article posted before. If you wish to contest this deletion, you may to so at deletion review. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Removal of speedy deletion tag
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Voceditenore (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Mayalld (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Mayalld (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)