User talk:Calneva1977

Rule of law in armed conflicts project
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rule of law in armed conflicts project, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.adh-geneva.ch/RULAC. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts Project (RULAC)
A tag has been placed on Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts Project (RULAC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  15:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

status and advice
As reviewing administrator, I think it did not clearly fall under the criteria for web sites, being more than a web site, and in any case made clear indications of importance, & I declined to speedy delete. But it absolutely must have 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases), to stay in Wikipedia. I'd advise you to add this very quickly, before it gets nominated for regular deletion. DGG (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)